Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2017 Nov;53(11):2154–2169. doi: 10.1037/dev0000388

Table 4.

Standardized Coefficient Estimates from Sensitivity Analyses for Longitudinal Relations among Exploration, Commitment, and Salience Level and Variability

Model S1
Freely estimated model
Model S2
Alternative salience estimates 1
(n = 364)
Model S3
Alternative salience estimates 2
(n = 355)
Model S4
Estimates from Waves 1 to 6
(n = 212)
β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p
Process → Content
W2 exploration → W3 salience mean −.04   .08 −.06   .06 −.02   .06 −.05   .03
W2 exploration → W3 salience variability   .07   .07   .07   .06   .00   .05   .06   .03
W2 commitment → W3 salience mean   .12   .03 ***   .11   .03 ***   .08   .01 ***   .16   .05 **
W2 commitment → W3 salience variability −.06   .02 *** −.04   .02 * −.02   .03 −.14   .07 *
Content → Process
W1 salience interaction → W2 exploration −.12   .05 ** −.07   .02 *** −.08   .02 *** −.10   .05 *
W1 salience interaction → W2 commitment −.06   .06 −.01   .04 −.03   .05 −.03   .04
W3 salience interaction → W4 exploration −.03   .02 +
W3 salience interaction → W4 commitment   .02   .05

Note: Salience interaction represents the interaction between salience level and variability. In Models S2 to S4, the same longitudinal path between process and content was constrained to be equal over time (e.g., W1 salience interaction → W2 exploration, W3 salience interaction → W4 exploration). Moreover, in Model S4, the same longitudinal paths involving Wave 5 and 6 were also constrained to be equal over time (e.g., W2 commitment → W3 salience mean, W4 commitment → W5 salience mean), although these paths were not displayed in the table.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001