Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 19;8(60):101876–101886. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22056

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of OS.

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% Cl) p value HR (95 % Cl) p value
RNF187 expresssion (positive vs negative) 1.766(1.157–2.696) 0.008 0.810 (0.478–1.375) 0.436
Tumor diameter (cm) (≤ 5 vs > 5) 1.725 (1.133–2.628) 0.011 0.805(0.395–1.409) 0.367
Tumor number (1 vs. ≥ 2) 3.018 (1.917–4.749) 1.81E-6 1.099(0.570–2.121 ) 0.778
Vascular invasion (positive vs negative) 2.392 (1.555–3.679) 7.21E-5 1.453(0.857–2.464) 0.166
AFP (ng/ml) (≤ 400 vs > 400) 1.427 (0.906–2.248) 0.125 n.a.
TNM stage (I-II vs III-IV) 6.461 (4.170–10.01) 6.63E-17 4.922(2.759–5.621) 5.63E-8.
Tumor differentiation 5.608 (3.625–8.674) 9.43E-15 3.478(2.085–5.495) 8.13E-7
Sex (male vs female) 1.776 (0.891–3.544) 0.103 n.a.
Liver cirrhosis (positive vs negative) 0.748 (0.345–1.620) 0.462 n.a.
ALT (U/L) (≤ 50 vs > 50) 1.003 (0.545–1.846) 0.993 n.a.
Age (years) (≤ 50 vs > 50) 1.766 (0.891–3.544) 0.103 n.a.
HBsAg (positive vs negative) 0.817 (0.491–1.358) 0.435 n.a.

Abbreviations and Note: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; TNM, tumor node metastasis; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; n.a., not applicable; The X2 test was used for comparison between groups. 50 % for RNF187.