Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 19;8(60):101876–101886. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22056

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of DFS.

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR (95%Cl) p value HR (95% Cl) p value
RNF187 expresssion (positive vs negative) 2.137 (1.404–3.253) 3.97E-4 1.142 (0.687–1.900) 0.608
Tumor diameter (cm, ≤ 5 vs > 5) 1.110 (1.055–1.167) 5.24E-5 1.252 (0.696–2.176) 0.476
Tumor number (1 vs. ≥2) 1.618 (1.100–2.380) 0.015 1.251 (0.673–2.328 ) 0.478
Vascular invasion (positive vs negative) 2.544 (1.674–3.867) 1.22E-5 1.594 (0.883–2.416) 0.025
AFP (ng/ml, ≤ 400 vs > 400) 1.151 (0.810–1.263) 0.160 na
TNM stage (I–II vs III–IV) 4.211 (2.756–6.433) 2.94E-11 2.332 (1.304–4.171) 0.004
Tumor differentiation 3.273 (2.147–4.990) 3.53E-8 1.809 (1.096–2.985) 0.002
Sex (male vs. female) 1.441 (0.766–2.708) 0.257 n.a.
Liver cirrhosis (positive vs negative) 0.677 (0.313–1.465) 0.322 n.a.
ALT (U/L, ≤ 50 vs > 50) 0.684 (0.343–1.362) 0.280 n.a.
Age (years, ≤ 50 vs > 50) 1.236 (0.809–1.889) 0.327 n.a.
HBsAg (positive vs negative) 1.057 (0.623–1.791) 0.838 n.a.

Abbreviations and Note: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; TNM, tumor node metastasis; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; n.a., not applicable; The X2 test was used for comparison between groups. 50 % for RNF187.