Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;8(60):102244–102253. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22288

Table 3. Meta-analysis results of all the studies.

Study Heterogeneity
Outcome of interests Study number OR/WMD (95% CI) P value χ2 df I2, % P value
Survival
30-day mortality
PEG vs. PRG 4 0.81 (0.28, 2.30) 0.69 1.49 3 0 0.68
PEG vs. RIG 3 0.83 (0.37, 1.89) 0.66 0.66 2 0 0.72
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 6 0.87 (0.46, 1.63) 0.66 1.39 5 0 0.93
Survival length
PEG vs. PRG 2 0.34 (–8.12, 8.81) 0.94 441.96 1 100 <0.00001
PEG vs. RIG 4 1.10 (–1.14, 3.33) 0.33 8.51 3 65 0.04
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 5 0.67 (–2.63, 3.97) 0.69 144.12 4 97 <0.00001
Peri-complication
Difficult procedure
PEG vs. PRG 2 1.20 (0.58, 2.51) 0.62 0.55 1 0 0.46
PEG vs. RIG 2 1.59 (0.81, 3.16) 0.18 0.01 1 0 0.91
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 3 1.45 (0.84, 2.51) 0.18 0.15 2 0 0.93
Success Attempt Rate
PEG vs. PRG 4 0.19 (0.03, 1.33) 0.09 7.18 3 58 0.07
PEG vs. RIG 2 0.38 (0.04, 3.76) 0.41 3.43 1 71 0.06
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 5 0.18 (0.04, 0.86) 0.03 10.11 4 60 0.04
O2 desaturation
PEG vs. RIG 2 2.13 (0.56, 8.17) 0.27 0.02 1 0 0.88
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 2 1.32 (0.45, 3.88) 0.61 0.08 1 0 0.77
Distress
PEG vs. RIG 2 1.92 (0.12, 30.63) 0.65 2.83 1 65 0.09
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 2 1.87 (0.13, 26.48) 0.64 2.58 1 64 0.10
Respiratory arrest
PEG vs. PRG 2 7.29 (0.27, 193.68) 0.24 NA NA NA NA
PEG vs. RIG 2 3.77 (0.41, 34.92) 0.24 NA NA NA NA
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 3 4.55 (0.71, 29.04) 0.11 0.11 1 0 0.74
Post-complication
Infection
PEG vs. PRG 2 2.20 (0.67, 7.19) 0.19 0.58 1 0 0.45
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 2 0.90 (0.49, 1.67) 0.74 1.65 1 39 0.20
Pain
PEG vs. PRG 2 0.49 (0.24, 0.98) 0.04 0.83 1 0 0.36
PEG vs. RIG 3 0.42 (0.25, 0.69) 0.0007 1.69 2 0 0.43
PEG vs. PRG+RIG 4 0.42 (0.27, 0.67) 0.0002 2.24 3 0 0.52

OR, odds ratio; WMD, weighted mean difference; PEG, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy; PRG, Per-oral Image-Guided Gastrostomy; RIG, Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy.