Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 12;4(6):ENEURO.0317-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0317-17.2017

Table 2.

Stimulus-specific effects on single-unit NCM auditory responsiveness

Dependent variable (single-unit data) Model Statistical tests F-values and degrees of freedom p-value Effect size (partial η2) Post hoc results
Development (aCSF; Trial 1 only)
    z-score Phase × hemisphere × stimulus Three-way ANOVA; Tukey’s HSD F(7, 292) = 4.682 <0.001 0.101 WN < CON1, CON2, HET, JUV CON, and JUV REV CON (p < 0.003)
    Stimulus-evoked firing Phase × hemisphere × stimulus Three-way ANOVA; Tukey’s HSD F(7, 292) = 2.400 0.022 0.054 WN < CON1 and HET (p < 0.022)
    Classification accuracy Phase × hemisphere × stimulus Three-way ANOVA; Tukey’s HSD F(7, 262) = 2.529 0.016 0.063 WN < JUV CON (p = 0.023)
    Effect of E2 (aCSF vs. E2)
Sensory
    z-score Trial × hemisphere × stimulus Three-way ANOVA F(5, 72) = 2.062 0.080 0.125 n/a
    Stimulus-evoked firing Trial × hemisphere × stimulus Three-way ANOVA F(5, 72) = 1.495 0.202 0.094 n/a
    Classification accuracy Trial × hemisphere × stimulus Three-way ANOVA F(1, 54) = 1.298 0.278 0.107 n/a
    Sensorimotor
z-score
    Left NCM Trial × stimulus Two-way ANOVA; Tukey’s HSD F(7, 112) = 3.097 0.005 0.162 WN < BOS, CON1, CON2, and HET (p < 0.038)
    Right NCM Trial × stimulus Two-way ANOVA F(5, 90) = 2.275 0.054 0.112 n/a
Stimulus-evoked firing
    Left NCM Trial × stimulus Two-way ANOVA F(7, 112) = 1.365 0.227 0.079 n/a
    Right NCM Trial × stimulus Two-way ANOVA F(5, 90) = 0.558 0.732 0.030 n/a
Classification accuracy
    Left NCM Trial × stimulus Two-way ANOVA; Tukey’s HSD F(7, 112) = 2.415 0.024 0.131 WN < JUV CON (p = 0.048)
    Right NCM Trial × stimulus Two-way ANOVA F(5, 90) = 0.880 0.498 0.047 n/a

n/a, not applicable.