Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;19:278. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1479-6

Table 2.

The incidence of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in Bergen health area 1972–2012

a Mean annual cumulative incidence
All time 1972–1992 1993–2012
Cumulative incidence 95% CI Cumulative incidence 95% CI Cumulative incidence 95% CI
All patients 16.7 (15.5, 18.0) 11.2 (9.8, 12.7) 22.5 (20.5, 24.7)
Sex
 Female 37.7 (35.8, 39.6) 20.7 (18.8, 22.7) 55.4 (52.2, 58.8)
 Male 14.3 (13.2, 15.5) 10.5 (9.2, 12.0) 18.3 (16.5, 20.3)
Age, years
 <60 2.8 (2.3, 3.3) 1.5 (1.0, 2.1) 4.1 (3.3, 5.0)
 60–69 15.5 (14.4, 16.8) 10.9 (9.6, 12.4) 20.3 (18.4, 22.4)
 70–79 34.5 (32.8, 36.4) 23.4 (21.4, 25.6) 46.2 (43.3, 49.2)
 80+ 26.8 (25.3, 28.4) 14.3 (12.8, 16.0) 39.9 (37.2, 42.7)
ESR, mm/h
 ESR <85 8.2 (7.3, 9.1) 4.5 (3.7, 5.5) 12.0 (10.6, 13.6)
 ESR >85 8.4 (7.6, 9.3) 6.6 (5.5, 7.7) 10.4 (9.0, 11.8)
b Relative risk (RR) according to time, sex, age and ESR
1972–1992 1993–2012
RR 95% CI p value RR 95% CI p value
Unadjusted
 Time, years 1.1 (1.1, 1.1) <0.001 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.543
Sex
 Time, years) 1.1 (1.1, 1.1) <0.001 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.014a
 Sex (male vs. female) 0.5 (0.4, 0.6) <0.001 0.3 (0.3, 0.4) <0.001
Age
 Time, years 1.1 (1.1, 1.1) <0.001 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.135
 60–69 vs. <60 7.2 (5.1, 10.6) <0.001 5.0 (3.9, 6.4) <0.001
 70–79 vs. <60 15.4 (11.0, 22.5) <0.001 11.3 (9.1, 14.3) <0.001
 80+ vs. <60 9.5 (6.7, 13.9) <0.001 9.8 (7.8, 12.4) <0.001
ESR
 Time, years 1.1 (1.1, 1.1) <0.001 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) 0.632
 ESR, >median vs. <median 1.4 (1.1, 1.9) 0.006 0.9 (0.7, 1.0) 0.116

Overall and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)-specific cumulative incidence reported as cases per 100,000 background population over the age of 50 years. Incidence for sex reported per 100,000 women or men, respectively, and incidence for the different age categories reported per 100,000 population of the same age categories (<60 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years and 80+ years). Relative risk calculated according to Poisson regression models for the two time periods 1972–1992 and 1993–2012. CI confidence interval

aThe RR changed significantly, but the magnitude of the change was too small to visualize with rounding to one decimal place: 1972–1992, RR 1.091 (95% CI 1.076–1.106); 1993–2012, RR 1.011 (95% CI 1.002–1.020)