Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 16;17:288. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0681-3

Table 2.

Characteristics of PIMs at admission and at discharge among the 158 patients who survived until discharge

Category Intervention
n = 31
Usual care
n = 127
At admission At discharge p-value At admission At discharge p-value
Any PIMs,a n (%) 29 (93.5) 16 (51.6) < 0.001 95 (74.8) 87 (68.5) 0.33
Benzodiazepines, n (%) 11 (35.5) 7 (22.6) 43 (33.9) 37 (29.1)
PPIs, n (%) 10 (32.3) 4 (12.9) 33 (26.0) 31 (24.4)
Hypnoticsb, n (%) 5 (16.1) 2 (6.5) 17 (13.4) 13 (10.2)
Antipsychotics, n (%) 4 (12.9) 2 (9.8) 12 (9.4) 9 (7.1)
Anticholinergics, n (%) 2 (6.5) 1 (3.2) 13 (10.2) 12 (9.4)
H2-receptor antagonistsc, n (%) 1 (3.2) 0 (0.0) 9 (7.1) 8 (6.3)
Anticonvulsants, n (%) 2 (6.5) 2 (6.5) 6 (4.7) 8 (6.3)
Opioids, n (%) 2 (6.5) 2 (6.5) 5 (3.9) 3 (2.4)
SSRIs, n (%) 1 (3.2) 1 (3.2) 4 (3.1) 4 (3.1)
Others, n (%) 5 (16.1) 1 (3.2) 12 (9.4) 11 (8.7)

aPIMs were defined based on the 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria

bThis category included non-benzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics

cThis category included only H2-receptor antagonist use for dementia