Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 16;17:132. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0488-6

Table 4.

Responses to items measuring attitudes towards population-based genetic testing for ovarian cancer risk (n = 146)

Strongly disagree N (%) Disagree N (%) Neither N (%) Agree N (%) Strongly agree N (%)
It would help identify those with a high risk of ovarian cancer. 0 10 (6.8) 17 (11.6) 104 (71.2) 15 (10.3)
My patients could be discriminated against by insurers due to genetic testing results. 7 (4.8) 38 (26.0) 34 (23.3) 63 (43.2) 4 (2.7)
It could be cost effective in the long term. 1 (0.7) 27 (18.5) 50 (34.2) 57 (39.0) 11 (7.5)
Explaining genetic testing to patients would be too time consuming. 14 (9.6) 65 (44.5) 32 (21.9) 32 (21.9) 3 (2.1)
It would help patients make good healthcare decisions about managing risk. 1 (0.7) 13 (8.9) 23 (15.8) 99 (67.8) 10 (6.8)
It could have a negative impact on some of my patients. 1 (0.7) 16 (11.0) 21 (14.4) 94 (64.4) 14 (9.6)
Willingness to offer population-based genetic testing
I would be willing to offer all my adult female patients genetic testing for OC risk. 8 (5.5) 33 (22.6) 35 (24.0) 53 (36.3) 17 (11.6)