Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;2017:2629310. doi: 10.1155/2017/2629310

(e).

Author Year Correlation summary
Clinical group Typical group
Chang et al. 2012 Total score and SC baseline (r = 0.45)
Total score and tone amplitude (r = 0.56)
No significant correlations  
Total score and SC baseline (r = −0.08)
Total score and tone amplitude (r = −0.32)

Daluwatte et al. 2015 Sensory behaviour and PLR intensity at 872.1∗∗ (r = 0.32) and 8721.1∗∗ (r = 0.39); and PLR adaptation (r = 0.23) No significant correlations  
Sensory behaviour and PLR intensity at 872.1 (r = −0.11) and 8721.1 (r = −0.06); and PLR adaptation (r = −0.01)

Lane et al. 2010

Mangeot et al. 2001

Matsushima et al. 2016 Sensory behaviour and resting state HRV-HF (r = 0.38) No significant correlations  
Sensory behaviour and resting state HRV-HF (r = −0.17)

McCormick et al. 2014 No significant correlations (no data provided) No significant correlations (no data provided)

McIntosh et al. 1999

Miller et al. 2012

Schaaf et al. 2003

Schaaf et al. 2010

Schaaf et al. 2015

Schoen et al. 2009 No significant correlations (no data provided) No significant correlations (no data provided)

Su et al. 2010

Woodard et al. 2012 Total sensory behaviour and HR at stimulus presentation (r = 0.205) No significant correlations  
Total sensory behaviour and HR at stimulus presentation (r = 0.132)

Note. Sig at p = 0.05; ∗∗Sig at p = 0.01; SC: skin conductance; PLR: pupillary light reflex; HRV-HF: heart rate variability-high frequency; HR: heart rate.