Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;8:2178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02178

Table 3.

Spearman's correlations between fine-grained motion features and CIB composites for mother-infant dyads at 4 months (N = 19).

4 m Fine–grained motion features Body part CIB Composites
Maternal sensitivity Maternal intrusiveness Infant Involvement Infant negative emotionality Dyadic reciprocity Dyadic negative states Parent–led Child–led
Dyadic parameters Infant alternating onset ratio Upper-body 0.15
p = 0.55
−0.01
p = 0.96
−0.12
p = 0.64
0.21
p = 0.39
0.17
p = 0.49
0.04
p = 0.88
−0.13
p = 0.61
0.47
p = 0.04
Arms −0.11
p = 0.66
0.05
p = 0.83
0.06
p = 0.80
0.57
p = 0.01
0.02
p = 0.94
0.13
p = 0.60
−0.10
p = 0.69
0.14
p = 0.58
Head 0.34
p = 0.16
0.27
p = 0.26
0.17
p = 0.48
0.27
p = 0.27
0.37
p = 0.12
−0.19
p = 0.43
−0.10
p = 0.69
0.46
p = 0.05
Maternal alternating onset ratio Upper-body 0.46
p = 0.05
−0.30
p = 0.22
0.52
p = 0.02
−0.42
p = 0.07
0.31
p = 0.20
−0.27
p = 0.27
−0.17
p = 0.49
0.34
p = 0.16
Arms −0.02
p = 0.95
−0.24
p = 0.33
0.13
p = 0.59
−0.04
p = 0.86
0.05
p = 0.85
−0.03
p = 0.92
−0.05
p = 0.85
0.04
p = 0.87
Head 0.54
p = 0.02
−0.47
p = 0.04
0.80 p < 0.001 −0.36
p = 0.13
0.70
p = 0.001
−0.55
p = 0.01
−0.57
p = 0.01
0.36
p = 0.13
Infant coactive onset ratio Upper-body 0.41
p = 0.08
−0.14
p = 0.56
0.37
p = 0.12
−0.04
p = 0.86
0.23
p = 0.35
−0.26
p = 0.29
−0.24
p = 0.33
0.37
p = 0.12
Arms 0.01
p = 0.97
0.07
p = 0.78
−0.07
p = 0.78
−0.02
p = 0.94
0.01
p = 0.97
0.05
p = 0.83
0.33
p = 0.17
0.10p = 0.68
Head 0.05
p = 0.85
−0.03
p = 0.90
0.38
p = 0.11
0.14
p = 0.58
0.25
p = 0.30
−0.33
p = 0.17
−0.12
p = 0.62
0.10
p = 0.70
Maternal coactive onset ratio Upper-body 0.36
p = 0.13
−0.20
p = 0.41
0.17
p = 0.48
−0.65
p = 0.003
0.35
p = 0.15
−0.24
p = 0.32
−0.06
p = 0.81
0.14
p = 0.58
Arms 0.41
p = 0.08
−0.16
p = 0.50
0.37
p = 0.11
−0.29
p = 0.22
0.46
p = 0.05
−0.27
p = 0.27
−0.23
p = 0.34
0.30
p = 0.22
Head 0.35
p = 0.15
−0.20
p = 0.42
0.09
p = 0.72
−0.35
p = 0.15
0.20
p = 0.42
−0.11
p = 0.65
−0.14
p = 0.56
0.19
p = 0.45

Color indicates that the correlation is statistically significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).