Role-playing |
|
Advantages |
• Students can learn to apply their newly acquired knowledge in a safe environment. |
|
• The scenario of a case for role-playing is easily adjustable. |
|
• Students can experience different roles in the clinical scenario. |
|
• It is cost effective. |
Disadvantages |
• The activity may lack the sense of a real clinical situation. |
|
• It requires multiple well trained facilitators to make the learning activity successful. |
Efficacies |
• Learning to document relevant family history and conduct genetic risk assessment. |
|
• Developing interpersonal and communication skills |
|
• Gaining competencies in interprofessional collaborations |
|
• Understanding the ethical ramifications of genetic test results. |
|
• Learning the importance of counseling patients with genetic conditions. |
|
Standardized patients |
|
Advantages |
• Well-trained standardized patients can create an authentic learning atmosphere. |
|
• Students can learn to apply their newly acquired knowledge in a safe environment. |
|
• The clinical scenario is adjustable. |
Disadvantages |
• Hiring enough well-trained standardized patients could be costly. |
|
• Since the standardized patient session is generally one-on-one, it is hard to accommodate a large class size. |
Efficacies |
• Learning to document relevant family history and conduct genetic risk assessment. |
|
• Developing interpersonal and communication skills. |
|
• Understanding the ethical ramifications of genetic test results. |
|
• Learning firsthand the importance of counseling patients with genetic conditions. |
|
Computer-based modules |
|
Advantages |
• There is no physical constraint in designing a virtual scenario, therefore it is highly adjustable to the rapidly advancing genomic medicine. |
|
• The learning format affords flexible scheduling and pacing for learners. |
|
• It can target a large number of students with different skill levels |
|
• It is cost effective. |
Disadvantages |
• It lacks the human encounter |
|
• It can lack the sense of a real clinical situation. |
Efficacies |
• Acquisition of technical knowledge in genetic testing. |
|
• Recognizing the ethical ramifications of genetic test results. |
|
• Cultivating an attitude for life-long learning |
|
Case-based/problem-based learning |
|
Advantages |
• It can highlight the clinical relevance of basic science in disease diagnosis and patient care. |
|
• Designing cases for problem-based learning is highly adjustable. |
|
• It can highly motivate students since the learning process is led by students. |
Disadvantages |
• Group size needs to be relatively small. |
|
• It requires multiple well-trained facilitators to make the session effective. |
Efficacies |
• Learning to apply basic genetics concepts to clinical cases. |
|
• Acquisition of technical knowledge in genetic testing. |
|
• Learning to document relevant family history and recognize patterns of Mendelian inheritance. |
|
• Cultivating an attitude for life-long learning |
|
Personal genomic testing and cadaver genomic testing |
|
Personal genomic testing |
Advantages |
• The use of personal genomic information motivates students to learn. |
|
• Practical skills to use genomic testing in patient care are obtained through in depth hands-on learning. |
|
|
• An extensive array of knowledge for practicing genomic medicine can be obtained. |
Disadvantages |
• Positive test results and sequence variants of unknown significance can cause psychologically adverse effects on students. |
|
• Positive test results can cause family issues. |
|
• Hands-on instruction is labor intensive on instructors and not applicable for a large class size. |
|
• Genomic testing is expensive. |
Efficacies |
• Gaining an in-depth understanding of the risks, benefits, and limitations of genomic testing. |
|
• Learning to recognize pathogenic sequence variants and their inheritance pattern. |
|
• Increasing confidence in the ability to advise patients on genomic test results. |
|
• Gaining an in-depth understanding of genomic medicine concepts. |
|
• Cultivating empathy towards patients with genetic conditions. |
|
• Understanding the ethical ramifications of genetic test results. |
|
• Cultivating an attitude for life-long learning. |
Cadaver Genomic Testing |
Advantages |
• There is no concern for psychologically adverse effects on participating students. |
|
• Students are motivated to learn because of their invested work in cadaver dissection. |
|
• Students gain an experience in clinical reasoning of genomic testing results in relation to the pathological findings of the cadaver. |
Disadvantages |
• There could be potential ethical issues such as postmortem disclosure of genetic information. |
|
• DNA sample preparation from cadaver for sequencing can be technically challenging. |
|
• Genomic testing is expensive. |
Efficacies |
• Gaining an understanding of the risks, benefits, and limitations of genomic testing in relation to the known pathological conditions. |
|
• Learning to recognize pathogenic sequence variants and their inheritance pattern. |
|
• Learning to recognize that genomic tests require interpretation with respect to the pathogenic condition. |
|
• Understanding the ethical ramifications of genetic test results |
|
• Cultivating an attitude for life-long learning |