Table 2.
1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.W1 nativitya | – | |||||||||||
2. W3 economic hardshipb | −.19** | – | ||||||||||
3. W3 age | .07 | −.07 | – | |||||||||
4. W3 school enrollmentc | .02 | −.01 | .03 | – | ||||||||
5. W3 Spanish competency pressures | .34*** | −.01 | −.03 | .10 | – | |||||||
6. W3 English competency pressures | −.27*** | .44*** | −.03 | −.09 | −.13* | – | ||||||
7. W3 pressures to assimilate | −.16* | .26*** | −.01 | −.18** | .03 | .53*** | – | |||||
8. W3 pressures against assimilation | .04 | .22*** | −.10 | −.01 | .29*** | .30*** | .59*** | – | ||||
9. W4 aspiration-expectation gapd | −.09 | .10 | −.04 | −.02 | −.07 | .37*** | .27*** | .03 | – | |||
10. W4 risky behaviors | .14* | .26*** | −.05 | −.10 | .16* | .07 | .10 | .19** | .10 | – | ||
11.W5 riskybehaviors | .10 | .23*** | .01 | −.02 | .17** | .04 | .19** | .21** | .20** | .58*** | – | |
12. W5 educational attainment | .24*** | −.16* | .29*** | .10 | .13* | −.24*** | −.26*** | −.21*** | −.23*** | −.08 | −.14* | – |
Mean | .65 | −.02 | 18.92 | .40 | .77 | .43 | .75 | .46 | .70 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 11.29 |
SD | .48 | 2.36 | 1.00 | .49 | .99 | .82 | .80 | .64 | 1.61 | .30 | .27 | 1.51 |
Note: Sample presented here reflects the omission of 4 outliers whose education expectations exceeded their aspirations.
W1 = Wave 1, W3 = Wave 3, W4 = Wave 4, W5 = Wave 5. Sample Items: Spanish competency pressures (e.g., “I have a hard time understanding others when they speak Spanish”); English competency pressures (e.g., “I have a hard time understanding others when they speak English”); pressure to assimilate (e.g., “People look down upon me if I practice Mexican/Latino customs”); pressure against assimilation (e.g., “People look down upon me if I practice American customs”).
0 = Mexico-born, 1 = U.S.-born.
Economic hardship was coded so that higher values indicate more economic hardship.
0 = Dropped out, 1 = Currently attending school.
The aspiration–expectation gap was computed by subtracting mothers’ educational expectations from their aspirations (Range = 0–11).
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.