Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Educ. 2017 Mar 10;48(2):80–89. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2016.1271756

Table 2.

Student-level means and correlations of key variables

Mean (SD) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
Variable
1. Gender
2. Black/African American −.01*
3. Hispanic .00 −.15***
4. Asian .00 −.15*** −.05***
5. Other race .02* −.21*** −.07*** −.07***
6. Upper grade −.02** .01 .00 .01 −.02**
7. Alcohol access 1.93 (0.93) −.09*** .08*** .02** .05*** −.01 −.11***
8. Problem norm 2.57 (1.14) .09*** −.14*** .01 .01 .01 .06*** −.34***
9. Risky norm 2.67 (1.03) .11*** .00 −.01 .05*** −.02* −.01 −.06*** .09***
10. Problem – Discrepancy 0.00 (1.12) .09*** −.08*** .01 .01 .02** .06*** −.32*** .98*** .10***
11. Risk – Discrepancy 0.00 (1.02) .11*** −.01 −.01 .04*** −.02** −.01 −.06*** .10*** .99*** .10***
12. Current alcohol use 0.33 (0.47) .00 −.08*** .00 −.05*** .03*** .12*** −.19*** .15*** −.15*** .13*** −.14***
13. Binge drinking 0.20 (0.40) −.05*** −.11*** .00 −.04*** .03*** .14*** −.16*** .15*** −.15*** .13*** −.14*** .68***

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for continuous variables and point biserial correlation was used for continuous-dichotomous associations

*

p ≤ .05,

**

p ≤ .01,

***

p ≤ .001