Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 2;7(6):e014939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014939

Table 1.

Quality assessment criteria

1 Did the sample represent the population of interest?
2 Was loss to follow-up <35% and response rate >65%?
3 Were the prognostic factors measured with valid and reliable instruments?
4 Was the outcome of the study objectively measured?
5 Were important potential confounders (ie, age, gender, prior WA and comorbidity) appropriately accounted for in the analysis?
6 Was the statistical analysis appropriate?

WA, work absence.