Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 2;7(6):e014939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014939

Table 2.

Characteristics and findings of the included studies

Author (year) Place of study Study design Length of follow-up Study population Sample size and dropout Significant main factors* Non-significant main factors Measurements of RTW
Berglind and Gerner (2002)46 Sweden Prospective cohort 24 months Age: 18–55 years
Gender: NA
Pain: low back and neck
Work absence: ≥8 weeks
Pain duration: ≥8 weeks
n=289
Response rate: NA
Dropout: NA
Work motivation Work status (Yes/No)
Du Bois et al (2009)49 Belgium Prospective cohort 6 months Age: 18–64 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence: ≥4 weeks
Pain duration: ≥4 weeks
n=390
Response rate: 89%
Dropout: 0%
Disability
Pain behaviour
Fear avoidance beliefs
Type of work
Prior pain duration
Work status
(Yes/No)
Gallagher et al (1995)47 USA Prospective cohort 6 months Age: ≥18 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence: ≥24 weeks
Pain duration: ≥24 weeks
n=169
Response rate: NA
Dropout: 6%
Compensation status
Use of lawyer
Work status
(Yes/No)
Gross et al (2004) part I50 Canada Retrospective cohort (two cohorts) 12 months Age: x̅=41 (c1), 40 (c2), SD=10 (c1), 9 (c2) years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence :≥6 weeks
Pain duration: ≥6 weeks
n=150 (c1), NA (c2)
Response rate: 76% (c1), NA (c2)
Dropout: 32% (c1), 34% (c2)
Functional capacity Time until suspension of time-loss benefits, time until claim closure
Gross and Battié (2005)51 Canada Prospective cohort 12 months Age: x̅=42, SD=11 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence: ≥6 weeks
Pain duration: ≥6 weeks
n=138
Response rate: 70%
Dropout: 54%
Recovery beliefs Time until suspension of time-loss benefits, time until claim closure
Hansson et al (2006)52 Sweden Prospective cohort 24 months Age: 18–59 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back or neck
Work absence: ≥4 weeks
Pain duration: ≥4 weeks
n=1575
Response rate: 64%–79%
Dropout: 28%–55%
Quality of life
Disability
Prevalence of work resumption
Kuijer et al (2012)53 Netherlands Prospective cohort 12 months Age: 18–55 years
Gender: male
Pain: low back
Work absence: ≥6 weeks
Pain duration: ≥6 weeks
n=72
Response rate: NA
Dropout: 4%
Work ability Age
Functional capacity
Time until working ≥4 weeks
Schultz et al (2004)54 Canada Prospective cohort 3 months Age: 18–60 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence: ≥4 weeks
Pain duration: ≥4 weeks
n=781
Response rate: 32%
Dropout: 15%
Health transition
Recovery expectations
Coworker support Work status
(Yes/No)
Schultz et al (2005)48 Canada Prospective cohort 3 months Age: 18–60 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence: 4–6 weeks
Pain duration: ≥4 weeks
n=111
Response rate: NA
Dropout: 9%
Recovery expectations
Symptoms/complaints
Vitality
Mental health
Work status
(Yes/No)
van der Giezen et al (2000)55 Netherlands Prospective cohort 12 months Age:18–60 years
Gender: male and female
Pain: low back
Work absence: ≥12 weeks
Pain duration: ≥12 weeks
n=328
Response rate: 91%
Dropout=9%
Age
General health
Job satisfaction
Breadwinner
Pain intensity
Work status
(Yes/No)

*In all articles, except Berglind and Gerner46 and Hansson et al 52 p<0.05 has been used as level of significance.

c1, cohort 1; c2, cohort 2; NA, not applicable; RTW, return to work.