Table II.
The criterion AUCs best predicting the ITD thresholds. The AUCs for the stimuli used in the current study and Klein-Hennig et al. (2011) are shown above in the upper four and lower four rows, respectively. See also the caption of Table I.
| Stimulus | ITD Model | Fig. | Low SR | Medium SR | High SR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | ROC, No-MTF | 9 | 0.534 | 0.531 | 0.513 | |
| C excluding -0.5 | ROC, No-MTF | 0.530 | 0.527 | 0.513 | ||
| C | ROC, MTF | 14c | 0.542 | 0.546 | 0.537 | |
| C excluding -0.5 | ROC, MTF | 0.534 | 0.542 | 0.533 | ||
| Attack | ROC, No-MTF | 11 | 0.514 | 0.516 | 0.519 | |
| Attack | ROC, MTF | 14b | 0.556 | 0.577 | 0.578 | |
| Pause | ROC, No-MTF | 12 | 0.517 | 0.512 | (0.521) | |
| Pause | ROC, MTF | 14a | 0.549 | 0.563 | 0.553 | |