Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 19;44(12):6289–6303. doi: 10.1002/mp.12578

Table 1.

The mean DSC with standard deviation on the combined WM and GM after intersubject image registration by MI, CC, and 3D‐HAMMER, and three variants of our learning‐based method such as (a) RFR with no ACM and single output, (b) RFR with ACM and single output, and (c) RFR with ACM and multi‐output from the 2‐week‐old, 3‐, 6‐, 9‐month‐old images to the 12‐month‐old image. The best result for each column is shown in bold

Method 2‐week‐old to 12‐month‐old 3‐month‐old to 12‐month‐old 6‐month‐old to 12‐month‐old 9‐month‐old to 12‐month‐old
MI 0.614 ± 0.025* 0.602 ± 0.022* 0.675 ± 0.030* 0.717 ± 0.022*
CC 0.643 ± 0.030* 0.618 ± 0.025* 0.684 ± 0.024* 0.722 ± 0.020*
3D‐HAMMER 0.662 ± 0.023* 0.642 ± 0.026* 0.688 ± 0.025* 0.715 ± 0.023*
RFR with no ACM and single output 0.692 ± 0.035* 0.684 ± 0.037* 0.726 ± 0.067* 0.766 ± 0.033*
RFR with ACM and single output 0.707 ± 0.013* 0.703 ± 0.018 0.731 ± 0.015* 0.776 ± 0.012*
RFR with ACM and multi‐output 0.710 ± 0.012 0.701 ± 0.024 0.735 ± 0.026 0.780 ± 0.006