Table 1.
Number of patients |
Median age (years) |
Chemotherapy* (mg/m2) |
Rituximab schedule (mg/m2) |
Cumulative rituximab dose (mg/m2) |
Overall response rate† (%) |
Complete response rate† (%) |
Progression free survival (median) |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
104 Sequential arm: n = 53 | 63 | Fludarabine 25 d 1–5×6 cycles | 2 months following initial 6 cycles, Rituximab 375 weekly for 4 weeks | 1500 | 77 | 28 | 40 mo | Byrd18–19 |
Concurrent arm: n = 51 | 63 | Fludarabine 25 d 1–5×6 cycles | Rituximab 375 d 1 & 4 cycle 1 and d | 4125 | 90 | 47 | 32 mo | |
1 cycle 2–6 then | ||||||||
2 months following initial 6 cycles, Rituximab 375 weekly for 4 weeks | ||||||||
300 | 58 | Fludarabine 25 d 2–4 cycle 1, d 1 −3 cycles 2–6 | Rituximab 375 d 1 cycle 1 and 500 d 1 cycle 2–6 | 2875 | 95 | 70 | 57% at 6 years | Keating20–21 |
Cyclophosphamide 250 d 2–4 cycle 1, d 1–3 cycles 2–6 | ||||||||
817 FC arm: n = 409 | 61 | Fludarabine 25 d 1–3×6 cycles | None | 0 | 85 | 23 | 32 mo | Hallek22 |
Cyclophosphamide 250 d 1–3°—6 cycles | ||||||||
FCR arm: n = 408 | 61 | FCR (same as FC arm) | Rituximab 375 cycle 1 d 0 and 500 on d 1 cycle 2–6 | 2875 | 93 | 45 | 43 mo | |
64 | 63 | Pentostatin 2 d 1 q 3 weeks × 6 cycles | Rituximab 100 d 1, 375 d 3 and 5 cycle 1 and 375 d 1 cycle 2–6 | 2725 | 91 | 41 | 33 mo | Kay23 |
Cyclophosphamide 600 d 1 q 3 weeks × 6 cycles (cycles administered every 21 days) | ||||||||
50 | 58 | Fludarabine 20 d 2–4 cycle 1, d 1 −3 cycles 2–6 | Rituximab 375 d 1 cycle 1 and 500 d 14 cycle 1, d 1 and 14 cycle 2–6 & Rituximab 500 every 3 mo until relapse | 5875+500 every 3 mo until relapse | 100 | 79 | Response duration 22 mo | Foon24 |
Cyclophosphamide 150 d 2–4 cycle 1, d 1–3 cycles 2–6 | ||||||||
36 | 59 | Fludarabine 25 d 1–5×6 cycles then Cyclophosphamide 3000 every 3 wks × 3 cycles | Following 9 cycles of sequential FC, Rituximab consolidation 375 weekly for 4 weeks | 1500 | 89 | 61 | 43 mo | Lamanna25 |
30 | 57 | Fludarabine 25 d 2–4 cycle 1, d 1 −3 cycles 2–6 | Rituximab 375 d 1 cycle 1 and 500 d 1 cycle 2–6 | 2875 | 96 | 83 | Not reached at 39 mo | Faded27 |
Cyclophosphamide 250 d 2–4 cycle 1, d 1–3 cycles 2–6 | ||||||||
Mitoxantrone 6 d 2 cycle 1, d 1 cycles 2–6 | ||||||||
72 | 60 | Fludarabine 25 d 1–3×6 cycles | Rituximab 375 d 1 cycle 1 and 500 d | 5875 | 93 | 82 | Not reported | Bosch26 |
Cyclophosphamide 250 d 1–3×6 | 1 cycle 2–6, responders receive 375 q | |||||||
cycles Mitoxantrone 6 d 1 × 6 cycles | 3 months for 2 years | |||||||
117 | 64 | Bendamustine 90 d 1–2×6 cycles | Rituximab 375 d 1 cycle 1 and 500 d 1 cycle 2–6 | 2875 | 91 | 33 | 76% at 18 mo, median not reached | Fischer28 |
60 | 59 | Cyclophosphamide 200 d 3–5×6 cycles | Rituximab 375 d 2 cycle 1 and 500 d 2 cycle 2- 6 | 2875 | 92 | 72 | 38 mo | Parikh29 |
Fludarabine 20 d 3–5×6 cycles | ||||||||
Alemtuzumab 30 mg flat dose d 1, 3, 5×6 cycles |
Cycles are 28 days unless otherwise noted.
All responses were assessed by National Cancer Institute-working group (NCI-WG) 1996 criteria.
CFAR=FCR and alemtuzumab; CR=complete response; d=days; FC=fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; FR=fludarabine and rituximab; FCR=FC and rituximab; FCM-R=FCR and mitoxantrone; mo=months; PFS=progression-free survival; PCR=pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituxumab; pt(s)=patients; RD=response duration.