Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Ther. 2011 Jul 2;28(7):534–554. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0032-2

Table 2.

Randomized phase 3 clinical trials evaluating chemotherapy with or without rituximab for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.5–22–44

Study Patient population Arm
(number of
patients)
Treatment*
(mg/m2)
Response:
ORR (CR)
(%)
Progression
free survival
(months)
Overall
survival
Hallek22 Treatment naive CLL and an indication for therapy physically fit patients of any age with normal kidney function were enrolled Chemotherapy arm-FC (409) Fludarabine 25 d 1–3×6 cycles 80 (22) Median 32.8 83% at 3 yrs
CLL08 Cyclophosphamide 250 d 1–3×6 cycles (95% CI 29.6–36) 45 % at 3 yrs
Chemoimmunotherapy arm-FCR (408) FC same as chemotherapy arm 90 (44) Median 51.8 87% at 3 yrs
Rituximab 375 d 0 cycle 1, 500 mgd 1cycle 2–6 (95% CI 46.2- 57.6) 65% at 3 yrs
Reynolds44 80% previously untreated and 20% relapsed-”minimally treated” patients PCR (92) Pentostatin 4 d 1 × 8 cycles Cyclophosphamide 600 d 1 × 8 cycles 45(7) Not reported Not reported
US oncology Rituximab 375 (split dose d 8 and 9 of cycle 1, d 1 cycles 2–8) Cycles administered every 21 d
FCR (92) Fludarabine 20 d 1–5×6 cycles 58(17) Not reported Not reported
Cyclophosphamide 600 d 1 × 6 cycles
Rituximab 375 (split dose d 8 & 9 cycle 1, d 1 cycles 2–6)
Robak5 Previously treated patients with an indication for therapy Chemotherapy arm-FC (276) 58(13) 20.6 52 mo
REACH Chemoimmunotherapy arm-FCR (276) 70 (24) 30.6 Not reached
*

Cycles are 28 days unless otherwise noted.

All responses were assessed by National Cancer Institute-working group (NCI-WG) criteria.

CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; d=day(s); FC=fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; FCR=FC and rituximab; mo=month(s); ORR=overall response rate; pt(s)=patients; PCR=pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab.