Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2012;49(1):62–69.

Table 2. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data of Study Participants in Low versus High CBCL score groups.

Low Score Control Group (n=13) Low Score At Risk Group (n=14) Low Score Group Combined (n=27) High Score Group (n=10) Comparison
SNR 1237 ± 5.02 11.60 ± 5.70 NS: t = 0.400, d.f. = 35, p = 0.692
FWHM (ppm) 0.05 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.02 NS: t = 0.514, d.f. = 35, p = 0.610
Glu CRLB (%) 10.04 ± 3.11 10.11 ± 2.89 NS: t = 0.063, d.f. = 35, p = 0.950
Mean Glu (i.U.) 4.88 ± 2.07 6.00 ± 1.95 5.47 ± 2.05 5.45 ± 1.77 NS: t = 0.016, d.f. = 35, p = 0.987

All variables expressed as mean ± SD. SNR, Signal to Noise Ratio; FWHM, Full Width at Half Max; CRLB, Cramer-Rao Lower Bound; Glu, Glutamate; NS, non-significant.