Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 20;2017:9417908. doi: 10.1155/2017/9417908

Table 2.

Comparison between subgroups of hs-TnI positive versus negative and also between subgroup of lower versus higher NT-proBNT concentration (NS: nonsignificant).

First model—current Holter
Hs-TnI negative
n = 27
Hs-TnI positive
n = 19
5-year SCD risk in HCM 3.81 ± 3.23% 6.38 ± 4.17% P < 0.05
Lower NT-proBNP
n = 23
Higher NT-proBNP
n = 23
5-year SCD risk in HCM 4.14 ± 4.18% 5.18 ± 3.63% NS

Second model—all Holter
Hs-TnI negative
n = 27
Hs-TnI positive
n = 19
5-year SCD risk in HCM 4.25 ± 4.20% 6.90 ± 3.99% P < 0.05
Lower NT-proBNP
n = 23
Higher NT-proBNP
n = 23
5-year SCD risk in HCM 4.40 ± 3.62% 6.29 ± 4.18% NS