Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 21;52(10):691–697. doi: 10.1177/0018578717720506

Table 4.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bloodstream Isolates by Site of Acquisition.

Antimicrobial agent/combination Community-acquired (n = 161) Health care–associated (n = 159) Hospital-acquired (n = 70)
Ampicillin 63 (39) 47 (30) 17 (24)
Ampicillin-sulbactam 112/160 (70) 99/158 (63) 46 (66)
Cefazolin 128/160 (80) 112 (70) 47 (67)
Ceftriaxone 151 (94) 139 (87) 58/69 (84)
Cefepime 156 (97) 152 (96) 66 (96)
Piperacillin-tazobactam 157/159 (99) 151/157 (96) 65/69 (94)
Ertapenem 157 (98) 149 (94) 64 (91)
Meropenem 161 (100) 158 (99) 68 (97)
Ciprofloxacin 134 (83) 123/158 (78) 60/68 (88)
Gentamicin 147/158 (93) 148/158 (94) 63/69 (91)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 126/160 (79) 119/159 (75) 53 (76)
Cefepime + gentamicin 157 (98) 155/159 (97) 67/69 (97)
Cefepime + ciprofloxacin 158 (98) 152 (96) 66/69 (96)
Piperacillin-tazobactam + gentamicin 159 (99) 155/158 (98) 67 (96)
Piperacillin-tazobactam + ciprofloxacin 159/160 (99) 152/158 (96) 66/69 (96)
Meropenem + gentamicin 161 (100) 159 (100) 69 (99)
Meropenem + ciprofloxacin 161 (100) 158 (99) 69/69 (100)

Note. Data show number of susceptible isolates (%) or number of susceptible/number of tested isolates (%), if not all isolates were tested.