Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;14:172. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0630-8

Table 4.

Path coefficients for model shown in Fig. 1 in total sample (n = 229)

Path
Longitudinal associations of restriction Longitudinal associations of EAH Concurrent associations of Restriction and EAH EAH predicting future Restriction Restriction predicting future EAH
Restriction 21 m

Restriction 27 m
Restriction 27 m

Restriction 33 m
EAH 21 m

EAH 27 m
EAH 27 m

EAH 33 m
Restriction 21 m

EAH 21 m
Restriction 27 m

EAH 27 m
Restriction 33 m

EAH 33 m
EAH 21 m

Restriction 27 m
EAH 27 m

Restriction 33 m
Restriction 21 m

EAH 27 m
Restriction 27 m

EAH 33 m
b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 b 10 b 11
Model 1 Restriction with regard to food amount ppp = 0.14 0.62* 0.60* 0.19 0.46* 0.17* −0.02 0.01 −0.07 0.01 −0.20* 0.03
Model 2 Restriction with regard to food quality ppp = 0.23 0.68* 0.59* 0.14 0.47* −0.03 −0.09 −0.08 0.01 0.13 0.05 0.08

Note: EAH = eating in the absence of hunger; ppp = posterior predictive p-values; * p < .05