Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 1;16(1):21–31. doi: 10.1177/1534735416651719

Table 1.

Sleep Parameters at Baseline (PRE) and After 3 Months (POST) for Intervention Group (IG) Versus Control Group (CG)a.

Parameters IG
CG
PRE POST Effect of Time PRE POST Effect of Time
SE (%) 84.4 ± 4.3 84.6 ± 4.9 ns 85.2 ± 5.2 80.7 ± 6.0 P < .001b
AST (minutes) 392.6 ± 42.4 386.1 ± 42.2 P = .03c 402.1 ± 37.5 374.1 ± 40.3 P = .03c
IT (%) 88.4 ± 3.5 87.1 ± 4.4 ns 87.8 ± 3.6 83.7 ± 5.3 P < .001d
MAS (counts) 17.7 ± 7.6 15.9 ± 6.8 ns 13.7 ± 5.2 19.2 ± 7.1 P < .001b
AWT (minutes) 55.6 ± 22.5 52.6 ± 20.5 ns 49.9 ± 20.4 60.3 ± 20.4 P = .002e
MFI 25.0 ± 7.1 27.4 ± 8.0 P = .02c 27.2 ± 9.4 31.7 ± 10.6 P = .02c
SL (minutes) 11.7 ± 11.1 15.4 ± 9.5 ns 15.7 ± 10.0 25.1 ± 18.5 P = .046d

Abbreviations: SE, sleep efficiency; AST, actual sleep time; IT, immobility time; MAS, mean activity score; AWT, actual wake time; MFI, Movement & Fragmentation Index; SL, sleep latency; ANOVA, analysis of variance; RM-MANOVA, repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance.

a

Values presented as mean ± SD. No significant differences were observed in the sleep parameters between IG and CG in the PRE condition. See the main text for details about the statistical analyses.

b

RM-MANOVA followed by univariate analyses that found a significant interaction between group and time. The effect of time was assessed by using paired Student’s t tests with Bonferroni’s correction.

c

RM-MANOVA followed by univariate analyses that found no interaction between group, but a significant effect of time.

d

Wilcoxon test.

e

Mixed ANOVA that found a significant interaction between group and time. The effect of time was assessed by using paired Student’s t tests with Bonferroni’s correction.