Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 1;16(1):21–31. doi: 10.1177/1534735416651719

Table 3.

Anthropometric and Motion-Level Data at Baseline (PRE) and After 3 Months (POST) for Intervention Group (IG) Versus Control Group (CG)a.

Parameters IG (N = 19)
CG (N = 21)
PRE POST P PRE POST P
Weight (kg) 67.1 ± 11.9 66.6 ± 11.8 .03 64.5 ± 9.6 63.7 ± 9.5 .01
BMI (kg/m2) 25.4 ± 3.8 25.2 ± 3.7 .04 24.6 ± 3.4 24.3 ± 3.4 .01
Waist circumference (cm) 80.5 ± 11.0 79.8 ± 10.0 .04 80.3 ± 8.7 80.1 ± 9.1 ns
Fat mass (%) 33.7 ± 5.5 31.7 ± 6.6 .02 33.2 ± 6.2 32.7 ± 5.5 ns
Lean mass (%) 66.4 ± 5.4 68.2 ± 6.2 .04 66.8 ± 6.2 67.9 ± 5.5 ns
TEE (kcal) 2058.0 ± 180.9 2111.7 ± 222.2 ns 2123.0 ± 222.3 2113.7 ± 213.3 ns
Number of steps 9790.9 ± 2817.2 11071.1 ± 3520.9 .04 11001.6 ± 3702.2 11672 ± 3981.2 ns
METs average 1.32 ± 0.14 1.42 ± 0.17 .04 1.41 ± 0.18 1.43 ± 0.17 ns
PAL 1.49 ± 0.10 1.55 ± 0.12 ns 1.56 ± 0.14 1.57 ± 0.13 ns

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TEE, total energy expenditure; PAL, physical activity level.

a

Values presented as mean ± SD. The comparisons between IG and CG, both PRE and POST, did not show any statistical difference. Statistical significance is fixed at P < .025 (Bonferroni correction). The anthropometric and motion-level parameters’ comparison between IG and CG in baseline condition and after 3 months showed no significant difference.