Table 4.
Reference | Cohort/Study Name | Cases n | Controls n | Geographic Area | Exposure Assessment | Highest Group (Quartile, Quintile, etc) | Effect of Exposure on Outcome (Highest vs Lowest Exposure) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessing blood levels of fatty acids | |||||||
Bassett et al (2013)53 | Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study | 464 | 1717 | Australia | PPL FAs and FFQ at baseline | Quintiles %PPL EPA and DHA (not defined) | ↔ risk of PrCa EPA mvHR 1.05 (0.93-1.18) P = .42; DHA mvHR 0.99 (0.88-1.11) P = .86 |
Dietary intake quintiles (not defined) | ↔ risk of PrCa EPA mvHR 0.79 (0.56-1.12) P = .53; DHA mvHR 0.878 (0.61-1.25) P = .52 |
||||||
Brasky et al (2013)55 | SELECT Trial | 834 | 1393 | USA, Canada, Puerto Rico | Serum PPL at baseline | EPA >0.82% total FAs | ↔ risk of total, low-grade or high-grade PrCa |
DHA >3.62% total FAs | ↑ Total PrCa and low-grade PrCa DHA mvHR 1.39 (1.06-1.82) P = .009; mvHR 1.42 (1.06-1.89) P = .08 ↔ risk of high-grade PrCa with DHA |
||||||
Assessing dietary intake of fatty acids | |||||||
Schuurman et al (1999)54 | The Netherlands Cohort Study | 642 | 1525 | Netherlands | FFQ at baseline of cohort study | EPA intake 0.10 g/d DHA intake 0.18 g/d |
↔ PrCa risk for EPA RR 1.00 (0.73-1.35) P = .10 and DHA RR 1.03 (0.75-1.40) P = .19 |
Abbreviations: PPL, plasma phospholipid; FA, fatty acids; PrCA, prostate cancer; mvRR, multivariate relative risk; mvHR, multivariate hazard ratio; FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; ↓ decrease, ↑ increase, ↔ no effect; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.