Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;16(1):32–62. doi: 10.1177/1534735416656052

Table 4.

Case-Cohort Studies of Fish-derived omega-3 fatty acids and Prostate Cancer Incidence.

Reference Cohort/Study Name Cases n Controls n Geographic Area Exposure Assessment Highest Group (Quartile, Quintile, etc) Effect of Exposure on Outcome (Highest vs Lowest Exposure)
Assessing blood levels of fatty acids
Bassett et al (2013)53 Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study 464 1717 Australia PPL FAs and FFQ at baseline Quintiles %PPL EPA and DHA (not defined) ↔ risk of PrCa EPA mvHR 1.05 (0.93-1.18) P = .42; DHA
mvHR 0.99 (0.88-1.11) P = .86
Dietary intake quintiles (not defined) ↔ risk of PrCa EPA mvHR 0.79 (0.56-1.12) P = .53; DHA
mvHR 0.878 (0.61-1.25) P = .52
Brasky et al (2013)55 SELECT Trial 834 1393 USA, Canada, Puerto Rico Serum PPL at baseline EPA >0.82% total FAs ↔ risk of total, low-grade or high-grade PrCa
DHA >3.62% total FAs ↑ Total PrCa and low-grade PrCa DHA mvHR 1.39 (1.06-1.82) P = .009; mvHR 1.42 (1.06-1.89) P = .08
↔ risk of high-grade PrCa with DHA
Assessing dietary intake of fatty acids
Schuurman et al (1999)54 The Netherlands Cohort Study 642 1525 Netherlands FFQ at baseline of cohort study EPA intake 0.10 g/d
DHA intake 0.18 g/d
↔ PrCa risk for EPA RR 1.00 (0.73-1.35) P = .10 and DHA RR 1.03 (0.75-1.40) P = .19

Abbreviations: PPL, plasma phospholipid; FA, fatty acids; PrCA, prostate cancer; mvRR, multivariate relative risk; mvHR, multivariate hazard ratio; FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; ↓ decrease, ↑ increase, ↔ no effect; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.