Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;6:e30637. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30637

Figure 3. All genes contributing to the pathways and ontologies most significantly enriched for protein-altering substitutions between nose-colonizing and infection-causing bacteria.

The pathogenesis ontology, in which significant enrichments were observed in infection-causing but not nose-colonizing bacteria, is shown for comparison. Every gene with at least one substitution between nose-colonizing and infection-causing bacteria and which was up- (red) or down- regulated (blue) in one of the pathways or a member of one of the ontologies (blue) is shown. To the left, the number of altering (yellow/orange) and truncating (pink/red) B-class variants is shown, broken down by the population in which the mutant allele was found: nose (BC; yellow/pink) or infection site (BD; orange/red).

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Genes enriched for substitutions between nose-colonizing and infection-causing bacteria within patients are not the most rapidly evolving at the species level.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

An estimate of the dN/dS ratio between unrelated bacteria is shown for each gene, color-coded by the number of protein-altering substitutions between nose-colonizing and infection-causing bacteria within patients. There was a negative Spearman rank correlation between dN/dS ratio and substitutions within patients (ρ = –0.04, p=0.02).
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Gene set enrichment analysis is robust to species-level differences in dN/dS between genes.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

For every locus, expression pathway and gene ontology, we estimated dN/dS between unrelated S. aureus. There was no relationship between dN/dS and enrichment of protein-altering substitutions between nose-colonizing and infection-causing bacteria in (A) loci, (B) ontologies nor (C) pathways (non-significant correlations, p>0.05). When we incorporated variability in dN/dS between genes in the gene set enrichment analyses, the results were robust for (D) loci, (E) ontologies and (F) pathways, showing only small differences in significance (-log10 p-value) between the analyses that correct for locus length only (horizontal axes) and those that correct for locus length and dN/dS (vertical axes).