Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2017 Aug 9;62(17):7056–7074. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7dc9

Table 1.

Comparison between our implementation and the reported results from the Hünemohr and Bourque methods.

Method Mean estimation error (%)

ρe Z I SPR
Hünemohr Reported 0.4 1.7 3.9 0.6
Our implementation a 0.4 1.4 3.5 0.7
Bourque Reported 0.3 1.6 4.1 0.5
Our implementation b 0.3 0.8 3.5 0.6
a

The calibration material was CB2-50%.

b

The calibration materials included all 13 materials listed in table A1.