Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov 6;54(1):144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.015

Table 3.

Challenges and Future Directions in Using Wearables in Research and Clinical Settings

Participant/Patient challenges Challenges Potential solutions/Future directions
Participant/Patient
  • Technology knowledge and skills and other individual barriers

  • Access to necessary technology for device to function (i.e., smartphone, tablet, computer)

  • Willingness to wear/burden of data collection

  • Motivation for behavior change

  • Adherence to wearable protocols

  • Reactivity to wearing the device in observational studies

  • Desensitization to feedback in intervention protocols

  • Habituation or loss of enthusiasm as the device’s novelty wanes

  • Inability to afford wearable device

  • May not provide enough of an impetus for significant behavior change and maintenance

  • Conduct preliminary assessment to understand context and needs of study or clinical population to determine device feasibility/acceptability and identify pragmatic barriers to adherence

  • Utilize a co-design approach to intervention development that employs a range of participatory methods to develop interventions that are feasible and acceptable to end-users.

  • Develop strategies to overcome identified barriers to wearable usage and adherence (e.g., providing smartphone, paying for data usage costs, avoiding devices that require a smartphone rather than a standard computer, setting up effective reminder systems, choosing a device with a longer battery life, etc.)

  • Ensure tracker is part of an engaging overall study approach

  • Providing external prompts or reminders to ensure compliance as needed

  • Provide clear instructions as to how much wear time is requested, the battery life, and the desired frequency of syncing

  • Check-in with patients and participants regularly to ensure they are not having any issues

  • For interventions, provide a phased approach to “unlocking” intervention features

  • Conduct research to determine the extent of reactivity to wearable devices and whether and how this reactivity dissipates according to the duration of the wear period (e.g., 1 week versus 1 month) or the use of repeated wear periods (1 week at three separate time points)

  • Work with device manufacturers, employers, insurers, and healthcare systems to create programs to provide financial assistance or free devices to all individuals or those who are unable to afford wearables

  • Determine which individuals are non-responsive and may need additional augmentation strategies, which augmentation strategies are most efficacious and cost-effective, and what the optimal timing is for delivering these augmentation strategies

Device
  • Accuracy of PA assessment and intensity classification and inability to distinguish between postures (i.e., sitting, standing, lying)

  • Provision of clear, meaningful data that can be easily and accurately interpreted

  • Inequivalent metrics output by devices (most commonly) and public health recommendations for physical activity (minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity PA)

  • Length of time required to conduct a traditional, rigorous validation study

  • Rapid evolution of device design, features, user interface and software that is controlled by manufacturer

  • Proprietary algorithms and limited access to raw data

  • Features including durability, ease of use, battery life

  • Cost

  • Technology failures

  • Conduct research to understand the accuracy of wearables in comparison to research-grade accelerometers using more rapid research designs

  • Include clinicians and patients in development of feedback associated with device

  • Conduct research to convert output data from wearable to public health recommendations or work with device manufacturers to refine output metrics to make them meaningful

  • Coverage of device costs by insurer or employer

  • Establish best practices for analyzing and storing data

Clinical/Research setting
  • Ease with which data can be aggregated and harmonized

  • Development of effective and accurate algorithms

  • Education of clinical team

  • Integration with EHRs

  • Actionable reports for clinical/research staff

  • Efficacy/effectiveness of devices to change and maintain behavior without high level of oversight by research/clinical staff

  • Understand how to effectively integrate wearable data in EHRs so data are actionable by clinicians

  • Establish best practices for combing wearable data with other data and for storing, processing, and analyzing these data

  • Create standards for interpreting and processing data

  • Determine how wearable data can be incorporated into clinic flow without creating unnecessary burden

  • Develop educational materials and training to teach clinicians how to view, interpret, and act upon patient-generated data

  • Develop staffing, reimbursement, and other structural support to facilitate usage of data

  • Conduct interventions to assess the efficacy of device, alone, to change and maintain activity in patients with a variety of chronic conditions

PA, physical activity; EHR, electronic health record