Table 1.
Comparison of the compressible composite electrodes. The capacitances are obtained with symmetric full cells
| Materials | Uncompressed capacitance | Maximum compressive strain | Compressed capacitance | Content of pseudomaterials | Test condition | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe2O3/CNT sponge | 296.3 F g−1 | 70% | 266.7 F g−1 | 47 wt% | 5 mV s−1 | [8] |
| CNT@PPy sponge | 376 F g−1 | 60% | 338.4 F g−1 | 52.4 wt% | 0.5 A g−1 | [9] |
| CNT@ PPy@MnO2 sponge | 305 F g−1
9.6 F cm−3 |
50% | 275 F g−1
16.1 F cm−3 |
~ 60 wt% | 2 mV s−1 | [10] |
| Graphene/PPy foam | 350 F g−1
14 F cm−3 |
50% | 350 F g−1
28 F cm−3 |
N.A. | 1.5 A g−1 | [11] |
| Melamine foam/graphene/PPy sponge | 411 F g−1 | 75% | 329 F g−1 | 3.92 wt% | 10 mV s−1 | [12] |
| Sponge/PANI/CNT | 216 F g−1
3.4 F cm−3 |
60% | 210 F g−1 | 65 wt% | 0.64 A g−1 | [13] |
| Graphene/PANI aerogel | 424 F g−1
8.9 F cm−3 |
90% | 407 F g−1
85.5 F cm−3 |
63 wt% | 1 A g−1 | This work |
NA Not applicable