ABSTRACT
Predation of Chromobacterium piscinae by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 was inhibited in dilute nutrient broth (DNB) but not in HEPES. Experiments showed that the effector responsible was present in the medium, as cell-free supernatants retained the ability to inhibit predation, and that the effector was not toxic to B. bacteriovorus. Violacein, a bisindole secondary metabolite produced by C. piscinae, was not responsible. Further characterization of C. piscinae found that this species produces sufficient concentrations of cyanide (202 µM) when grown in DNB to inhibit the predatory activity of B. bacteriovorus, but that in HEPES, the cyanide concentrations were negligible (19 µM). The antagonistic role of cyanide was further confirmed, as the addition of hydroxocobalamin, which chelates cyanide, allowed predation to proceed. The activity of cyanide against B. bacteriovorus was found to be twofold, depending on the life cycle stage of this predator. For the attack-phase predatory cells, cyanide caused the cells to lose motility and tumble, while for intraperiplasmic predators, development and lysis of the prey cell were halted. These findings suggest that cyanogenesis in nature may be employed by the bacterial strains that produce this compound to prevent and reduce their predation by B. bacteriovorus.
KEYWORDS: Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100, Chromobacterium piscinae, cyanide, predation, violacein
IMPORTANCE
Bacterial predators actively attack, kill, and enter the periplasm of susceptible Gram-negative bacteria, where they consume the prey cell components. To date, the activity of B. bacteriovorus HD100 has been demonstrated against more than 100 human pathogens. As such, this strain and others are being considered as potential alternatives or supplements to conventional antibiotics. However, the production of secondary metabolites by prey bacteria is known to mitigate, and even abolish, predation by bacterivorous nematodes and protists. With the exception of indole, which was shown to inhibit predation, the effects of bacterial secondary metabolites on B. bacteriovorus and its activities have not been considered. Consequently, we undertook this study to better understand the mechanisms that bacterial strains employ to inhibit predation by B. bacteriovorus HD100. We report here that cyanogenic bacterial strains can inhibit predation and show that cyanide affects both attack-phase predators and those within prey, i.e., in the bdelloplast.
INTRODUCTION
Predation by microfaunal predators, i.e., protists and nematodes, is the chief reason for bacterial mortality in nature (1), although bacterial predators, such as Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus and Bacteriovorax stolpii, also contribute to bacterial mortality. In response to the constant threat of predation, bacteria have evolved several different mechanisms to protect themselves, including the production of secondary metabolites to combat the predator (2–4).
One well-known secondary metabolite with defensive capabilities is indole. With respect to predation, indole is both toxic to the bacterivorous nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (5) and capable of blocking predation of Escherichia coli and Salmonella by the bacterial predator Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 (6). Indole is produced by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (7, 8) and can reach concentrations of up to 1.1 mM within mammalian guts (9, 10). With C. elegans, a significant loss in viability was seen when indole was present at 0.5 mM or higher (5), while concentrations between 1 and 2 mM inhibited B. bacteriovorus mobility and hindered its development within the bdelloplast (6).
Another secondary metabolite with known activities against predators is violacein. This bisindole antibiotic was first described more than 70 years ago (11, 12), and it has since been shown to be produced by a variety of bacterial strains, including strains of Janthinobacterium (13, 14), Collimonas (15), Duganella (16, 17), and Chromobacterium (18, 19), including Chromobacterium piscinae (17). Although recent studies have emphasized the activity of violacein against antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (17, 20, 21), this compound is also active against various protists (3, 22), and it is known to be toxic to C. elegans (23, 24).
In addition to violacein, Chromobacterium violaceum also produces cyanide (25, 26), a potent inhibitor of cytochrome c oxidase (27). As a secondary metabolite, cyanide is generated by C. violaceum using glycine through an oxidative decarboxylation step (25, 26, 28), although other amino acids may also be used (29). Studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, which is also cyanogenic, found that the cyanide produced by this bacterium was sufficient to completely kill C. elegans cultures (30), illustrating its potential as a deterrent against predation.
Similarly, Serratia marcescens is known to produce several detergents, or serrawettins, that repel C. elegans (31). Pradel et al. (31) found that purified serrawettin W2 elicited a lawn avoidance response from C. elegans with E. coli OP50, i.e., the microbe typically used to cultivate this nematode, and that this response was mediated by its sole Toll-like receptor, encoded by tol-1. Prior to their study (31), the role of this receptor specifically in C. elegans avoidance of S. marcescens was known (32), but how C. elegans recognized this pathogen was not known. Burlinson et al. (33) also describes the characterization of the Pseudomonas fluorescens NZ17 EDB gene cluster, whose product repels C. elegans but does not kill it. Although the exact compound has yet to be identified, they were able to show that it is either poorly diffusible or associated with the bacterial cell, as C. elegans needed to encounter P. fluorescens NZ17 before the aversion response was initiated (33). Furthermore, using two C. elegans mutants, tax-2 and tax-4 mutants, they also demonstrated that this response involves both chemotactic and nonchemotactic elements.
In this study, we show that C. piscinae is preyed upon by B. bacteriovorus HD100 when provided in HEPES buffer but that it was resistant when the tests were performed in dilute nutrient broth (DNB). Through a series of experiments, we identified that the effector was present within the cell-free supernatants and, similar to the EDB cluster product, it was inhibitory but not overtly toxic toward B. bacteriovorus HD100.
RESULTS
C. piscinae produces an inhibitor of bacterial predation.
B. bacteriovorus HD100 preyed upon C. piscinae in HEPES buffer but not in dilute nutrient broth (DNB) (Fig. 1A). This result suggested that C. piscinae produced an inhibitory molecule when provided nutrients in the form of DNB and that it may be secreted into the supernatant. This was confirmed using E. coli MG1655 as the prey as shown in Fig. 1B, where filter-sterilized supernatants from C. piscinae cultures incubated in DNB inhibited predation (Fig. 1B). Once more, parallel tests performed in HEPES found no inhibitory activity. To study this further, C. piscinae was grown in DNB medium (initial optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.03), and the inhibitory activity at different time points was measured as described above with E. coli MG1655 as the prey (Fig. 1C). There was no apparent inhibition during the first 3 h. From 6 h on, however, predation was significantly inhibited, showing that the concentration of the inhibitor from this time point was sufficient to block B. bacteriovorus HD100. Using the supernatants after 24 h, we also found that the activity is dose dependent (Fig. 1D).
Violacein is not the inhibitor.
As one of the secondary metabolites produced by C. piscinae is the bisindole violacein (Fig. 2A), we initially thought that it was the inhibitor due to its structural similarity with indole (6). Cultures of C. piscinae grown in DNB produced, on average, between 0.3 and 0.5 mg/liter of violacein, or around 1 to 1.5 µM, although its concentration in the cell-free supernatants was close to zero, since it is hydrophobic and primarily associates with the C. piscinae cells. When C. piscinae is grown in NB medium, the violacein concentration can reach roughly 5 mg/liter (15 µM) (17). To evaluate whether violacein inhibited predation, we used the higher concentration (Fig. 2B). The same set of experiments was also performed using a commercial preparation of violacein that was produced by Janthinobacterium lividum to determine whether there are any differences based upon the host strain (Fig. 2B). In both cases, predation of E. coli MG1655 by B. bacteriovorus HD100 was not blocked.
C. piscinae produces cyanide, which inhibits predation.
In addition to violacein, C. piscinae was also found to produce a significant amount of cyanide when grown in DNB medium, with an average of 202 µM after 24 h (Fig. 3A, inset). Parallel experiments within NB medium found that after 24 h, the cyanide concentration was between 600 and 800 µM, while cultures incubated in HEPES produced very little or no cyanide (Fig. 3A, inset). A strong correlation is evident when the inhibitory activities of the supernatants (Fig. 1C) are compared with their respective cyanide concentrations (Fig. 3A). In P. aeruginosa, the cioAB genes encode a cyanide-insensitive oxidase, making this organism resistant to its own cyanide production (34). A BLASTP analysis using the P. aeruginosa CioA and CioB amino acid sequences (NCBI GenBank accession no. CAA71555.1 and CAA71556.1, respectively) found homologues encoded by C. piscinae genes (C. piscinae CioA [NCBI accession no. KIA81027] with 48% identity with P. aeruginosa CioA and C. piscinae CioB [NCBI accession no. KIA81026] with 43% identity with P. aeruginosa CioB). However, neither of these genes were found within the B. bacteriovorus HD100 genome, helping to explain why C. piscinae is resistant to cyanide while this predatory bacterium is not.
The impact of cyanide on predation was further confirmed in tests using potassium cyanide (KCN) (Fig. 3B and C). When the KCN concentration was 200 µM or greater, predation was completely blocked. As shown in Fig. 3B and C, under these conditions, the prey and predator populations after 24 h were similar with their initial values, i.e., 3.1 × 108 CFU/ml for E. coli and 1.3 × 107 PFU/ml for B. bacteriovorus HD100. Treatment of B. bacteriovorus HD100 with 200 µM KCN significantly reduced the motility of this predatory bacterium. Movie S1 in the supplemental material shows the predatory cells when present in HEPES buffer alone with an average speed of 18.2 ± 4.4 µm/s (n = 210), while in Movie S2, they were exposed to 200 µM KCN and had an average swimming speed of only 4.5 ± 2.8 µm/s (n = 210). The reduced motility (6, 35) helps to explain the weaker predatory activities seen with cyanide.
To test whether cyanide alone was responsible or whether some other compound also acted as an inhibitor, two additional experiments were performed (Fig. 3D): purging and treatment of the supernatant with vitamin B12a. In a neutral (pH 7) environment, cyanide is present primarily as hydrogen cyanide (HCN), which is less dense than air and volatile. Taking advantage of this characteristic, we purged the media with nitrogen gas and reduced the cyanide concentration in the media from 230 µM to only 20 µM. Likewise, vitamin B12a, or hydroxocobalamin, acts as a scavenger of cyanide, forming cyanocobalamin (36, 37), which prevents cyanide from binding to cytochrome c oxidase. After either treatment, B. bacteriovorus HD100 was able to prey upon E. coli MG1655 (Fig. 3D), confirming that cyanide is the main, if not sole, inhibitor responsible.
Cyanide halts B. bacteriovorus HD100 development in the bdelloplast.
Although cyanide inhibited predation, it was not very toxic to attack-phase (AP) B. bacteriovorus HD100, as shown in Fig. 4A. The viability decreased slightly from 100 µM cyanide, with the greatest loss in viability seen at 400 µM cyanide. Even at this concentration, however, the loss in viability was only 51%. When similar experiments were performed using bdelloplasts, no toxic effect was seen for any of the concentrations tested (Fig. 4B). In the control samples, the number of predators increased after 4 h and was on average 5.6-fold higher than the initial populations. A similar increase was seen in the 50 µM samples, although there appears to have been a delay since the number of B. bacteriovorus did not increase until 6 h. For the higher concentrations, there was no observable increase in the predator numbers after either 4 or 6 h. When bdelloplasts within the control cultures (0 µM cyanide) and cultures treated with 200 µM cyanide were imaged using confocal microscopy, we found that the development of the intraperiplasmic predator was halted after the addition of cyanide (Fig. 4C). In the control cultures, the predators within the bdelloplasts were elongated at 3 h, while only AP B. bacteriovorus HD100 cells were seen at 6 h, since lysis of the prey had already occurred. In contrast, the addition of 200 µM cyanide after 1 h halted the growth and development of the intraperiplasmic predator, as shown in Fig. 4C. Even after 6 h, the bdelloplasts are essentially indistinguishable from those imaged just before cyanide was added.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we show that predation of C. piscinae by B. bacteriovorus HD100 occurs in HEPES buffer, although it took 3 days to see a 60-fold drop in prey viability. Compared to other prey strains, this is rather protracted and implied that C. piscinae is inherently resistant to predation by B. bacteriovorus HD100. When the same tests were performed in DNB, there was no loss in the viability of C. piscinae, a result that implied that this bacterium produces an inhibitor when provided with amino acids. The only other report found describing the predation of a Chromobacterium strain was a study by Jurkevitch et al. (38). They found that four out of the five predatory strains they tested were capable of predating on C. violaceum but used HEPES buffer as the medium. On the basis of our findings here, this would be permissive for predation to occur.
Violacein is formed by a variety of bacterial strains, including C. piscinae (17), through a condensation reaction involving two tryptophan molecules (39, 40). Given violacein’s bisindole chemical structure and the established activity of indole against B. bacteriovorus HD100 (6), we initially thought that this compound was the C. piscinae inhibitor being produced. According to Choi et al. (17), C. piscinae produces slightly less than 4.5 mg/liter of violacein when grown for 24 h in NB medium. Although this is equal to a concentration of 15.4 µM, which is far lower than the 1 mM needed for indole to inhibit predation (6), it was much higher than what was actually seen in the DNB cultures (1.2 µM). Tests with both crude and commercial violacein preparations at the higher concentration found that this compound does not inhibit predation, consequently, violacein is not responsible for the loss in activity seen.
In addition to violacein, C. piscinae also produced cyanide when grown in DNB medium. Although the production of cyanide by C. violaceum was established long ago (25, 41, 42), this is the first report demonstrating that C. piscinae also produces cyanide. Cyanide is formed during the oxidative decarboxylation of glycine (25, 26, 28) and of glutamate and methionine (29). As the DNB medium used in this study contains both beef extract and an enzymatic digest of gelatin, all three of these amino acids are provided in this medium. When grown in DNB, C. piscinae produced an average of 202 µM cyanide after 24 h, although most (143 µM) was produced within the first 6 h (Fig. 3A). The production trend in Fig. 3A is quite similar with that published by Michaels et al. (25) during their characterization of C. violaceum. In both cases, there was a lag period that lasted for the first 4 h, after which the cyanide concentrations rapidly increased. The maximum cyanide concentration obtained with C. violaceum was approximately 16 mg/liter, or 600 µM, which is threefold higher than that produced by C. piscinae, i.e., 202 µM. Aside from likely variations in the two strains, this difference can be attributed to the composition of the medium used in each study, i.e., DNB (0.8 g/liter) here and 10 g/liter peptone in their study, as Michaels et al. (25) also reported that peptone greatly influenced the final cyanide yields with C. violaceum. As a demonstration of this, when C. piscinae was grown in NB (8 g/liter), the final cyanide concentrations were comparable at 600 to 800 µM.
Aside from C. violaceum and C. piscinae, bacterial cyanogenesis is best characterized in pseudomonads (28, 43), where it has been linked to both reduced nematode viability and egg hatching rates (30, 33, 44, 45). For instance, exposure to P. aeruginosa PAO1 completely (100%) killed C. elegans cultures, while only 15% of the nematode population was killed by an isogenic noncyanogenic mutant strain (30). Likewise, in Siddiqui et al. (44), the egg hatching rates for Meloidogyne javanica in control cultures were 90%. This rate dropped significantly (to 40%) when the cultures were exposed to the cyanogenic Pseudomonas protegens CHA0, but it dropped only slightly (85%) with P. protegens CHA77, an isogenic mutant lacking the ability to produce cyanide. Both studies illustrate the activity of cyanogenic bacteria against predatory nematodes and the potential benefit they gain from producing cyanide.
To date, bacterial cyanogenesis has been identified only in Gram-negative microbes (46), and this may be evolutionarily important given the selective activity of B. bacteriovorus, which attacks only Gram-negative strains. Cyanide acts by binding to and inhibiting cytochrome c oxidase (27), a key enzyme in the respiratory electron transport chain, making it a potentially strong poison for B. bacteriovorus HD100, since this microbe is regarded as a strict aerobe.
Although the effect cyanide has on bacterial predation has not been reported, it was studied from the perspective of electron transport systems of B. bacteriovorus and oxidation of NADH using attack-phase predatory cells or cell lysates (47). The authors found that 5 mM KCN completely inhibited respiration, while 0.5 mM KCN reduced NADH oxidation by 75% in cell-free extracts of B. bacteriovorus strain 6-5-S. Similarly, another study reported that the amino acid uptake by B. bacteriovorus 109D (H-I), a host-independent variant that can grow axenically, was inhibited by as much as 91% by 500 µM cyanide, while lower concentrations had lesser impact (48). Moreover, transport of phosphate into both B. bacteriovorus 109J and 109D was completely inhibited by 1 mM cyanide.
Although both studies used cyanide concentrations that were higher than the inhibitory concentrations found in this study, i.e., 100 to 200 µM, their findings help to explain the activity of cyanide as seen here. As cyanide impairs electron transport and energy production, as well as inhibits transport of critical nutrients (i.e., phosphate and amino acids) needed for the growth and development of the predator within the bdelloplast, the implication would be a halting of growth for intraperiplasmic predators when the cyanide concentration is sufficiently high. This is what was observed in Fig. 4C. However, our findings also clearly demonstrate that the effects of cyanide were not permanent, since exposed B. bacteriovorus cells still formed plaques and grew later when the cyanide was diluted. This was true for both the free-swimming B. bacteriovorus (Fig. 4A) as well as those within bdelloplasts (Fig. 4B). This is further exemplified in Movie S2 in the supplemental material, where predatory cells exposed to cyanide were still viable, although their ability to swim was severely impaired. This impairment was anticipated, since the flagellar motor activity is dependent upon the proton motive force, which is generated by the electron transport chain (ETC). Given that cyanide binds to cytochrome c oxidase, a member of the ETC, and inhibits any further electron transport, the proton motive force would quickly be spent and bacterial motility partially halted. This was seen in both P. fluorescens (49) and E. coli (50). For P. fluorescens, 2 min was sufficient to achieve a stable level of inhibition, illustrating the rapid loss of motility during exposure. For E. coli, exposure to 100 µM cyanide led to both a 63% reduction in the average speed of this bacterium and a 38% reduction in the number of cells that were motile. Both of these studies illustrate the same response as seen with B. bacteriovorus HD100 when exposed to cyanide in this study.
Conclusions.
In addition to the clear impact bacterial cyanogenesis has on macrofaunal predators (i.e., nematodes and protozoa), this study illustrates an additional benefit for cyanogenic bacterial strains, namely, that they may be shielded and protected from bacterial predation. The amount of cyanide produced by C. piscinae when provided DNB was sufficient to inhibit predation by B. bacteriovorus and halt the development of the predator within the bdelloplast. From an ecological perspective, this suggests that bacterial cyanogenesis may be used to protect natural microbial communities from predation by B. bacteriovorus. Given the small amount of nutrients present in this medium and the clear impact they had on the predation results, this study also suggests that caution should be taken in defining bacterial strains that are susceptible to predation and those that are resistant, as secondary metabolites clearly can play a role.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and culturing methods.
The strains used in this study were Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 (DSMZ 50701), Chromobacterium piscinae LMG 3947, and E. coli MG1655 (ATCC 700926). Culturing of B. bacteriovorus HD100 was performed as described previously (51, 52) using E. coli MG1655 as the prey. C. piscinae and E. coli MG1655 were grown from frozen stocks on nutrient broth (NB) agar plates at 30°C overnight. A single colony was inoculated into fresh NB medium and grown for 24 h at 30°C and 250 rpm.
For the predation studies, the prey cells were pelleted by centrifugation (15 min, 2,000 × g) and resuspended to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 in either dilute nutrient broth (DNB; 1/10 NB) or HEPES buffer (pH 7.2), both supplemented with 3 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM CaCl2. The cultures were split in half, and one half had B. bacteriovorus HD100 added to a predator-to-prey ratio (PPR) of approximately 0.03. The other half was used as an unpredated control sample. The initial prey and predator viabilities and viabilities after 24 h were determined as described previously using top agar plates (51).
C. piscinae supernatant experiments.
C. piscinae was cultured as described above for 24 h in NB (30°C and 250 rpm), after which the culture was diluted 1:100 into either HEPES buffer or DNB medium. These cultures were incubated for an additional 24 h at 30°C and 250 rpm. At this time, the supernatants were collected by removing the C. piscinae cells through centrifugation (15 min, 2,000 × g) and sterilized using a 0.22-µm filter (Millipore, USA). To these supernatants (DNB and HEPES), E. coli MG1655 was added as described above to an OD600 of 1.0. The cultures were split in half, and one half had B. bacteriovorus HD100 added to a predator-to-prey ratio (PPR) of approximately 0.03. The other half was used as an unpredated control sample. The initial prey and predator viabilities and the viabilities after 24 h were determined as described previously (51). A similar protocol was used for the supernatant dose-dependent experiments. For these tests, the cell-free C. piscinae DNB supernatants were diluted using HEPES buffer to achieve the desired percent supernatant. E. coli MG1655 was then added to an OD600 of 1.0, and the predation tests were performed as described above.
To study the impact of the C. piscinae growth stage on predation, DNB cultures were prepared as described above, and samples were taken at set times (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h) for OD600 measurement and predation tests. The C. piscinae cells were removed from these samples as described above using centrifugation and filtration. E. coli MG1655 was resuspended in the supernatant samples to an OD600 of 1.0, and B. bacteriovorus HD100 was added to a PPR of approximately 0.03. After 24 h at 30°C and 250 rpm, the OD of the different cultures were measured at 600 nm.
Violacein preparation and tests.
To test the effects of violacein, we purchased violacein from Sigma-Aldrich (USA), prepared using Janthinobacterium lividum, as well as purified violacein from the C. piscinae cultures grown in our lab. To purify violacein, we used the ethanol extraction method as described previously (17) followed by crystallization using acetone (11). The concentration of violacein within the samples was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described previously (17). This method was used for both the preparation and the supernatant samples.
Stock solutions (100×) containing 0.05 g/liter and 0.5 g/liter of either violacein preparation were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). To E. coli MG1655 cultures in HEPES, prepared as described above to an OD600 of 1.0, the violacein stock was added at a 1:100 dilution. The cultures were split in half, and immediately afterwards, B. bacteriovorus HD100 was added to one of the tubes to give a PPR of approximately 0.03. All the tubes were incubated at 30°C with shaking at 250 rpm for 24 h. The prey and predator viabilities were determined initially (0 h) and after 24 h.
Cyanide concentration determination.
To measure the cyanide concentrations in the culture media, we used a modified method based upon previous studies (53, 54). Briefly, 0.1 M o-dinitrobenzene (Fluka, Germany) and 0.2 M p-nitrobenzaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) solutions were prepared in 2-methoxyethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). For each measurement, a fresh 1:1 mixture of these two solutions was made, and this was mixed 77:23 with the supernatant samples (100 µl total). Afterwards, 1.8 µl of 5 M NaOH was added to each sample, giving a final concentration of 0.09 M NaOH, which was required to adjust the pH prior to measurement. The supernatants were diluted as needed to ensure that the cyanide concentration was within the measurable range. After mixing, the samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and then 900 μl of 2-methoxyethanol was added to each tube. From each sample, 100 µl was aliquoted into the wells of transparent 96-well plates (SPL, South Korea), and the OD578 was determined. The cyanide concentrations were calculated using a calibration curve prepared with known KCN solutions.
Purging and hydroxocobalamin experiments.
The C. piscinae cell-free DNB supernatants were prepared as described above. Each supernatant sample (20 ml) was then purged with nitrogen gas (flow rate, 3 liters/min) for 1 h. After purging, the medium was reconstituted to 20 ml using sterile water, and the predation experiments were performed as described above using E. coli MG1655 as the prey.
Hydroxocobalamin (vitamin B12a) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Stock solutions of this vitamin were prepared using sterile water and subsequently filter sterilized before use. For the experiments, the C. piscinae cell-free DNB supernatants were prepared as described above. To each, 200 µM hydroxocobalamin was added just prior to introducing the prey or predator.
Potassium cyanide inhibition of predation.
Potassium cyanide (KCN) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). A stock solution (1 M) was prepared using sterile deionized water and filter sterilized (0.22-µm syringe filter; Millipore [USA]). The cyanide stock was diluted to a 2× concentration using sterile HEPES buffer and subsequently mixed 1:1 (vol/vol) with an E. coli culture, prepared in HEPES to an OD of 2.0. Immediately afterwards, B. bacteriovorus HD100 was added to the samples to obtain a PPR of approximately 0.03. After 24 h at 30°C and 250 rpm, the surviving E. coli and resulting B. bacteriovorus HD100 populations were determined.
Potassium cyanide impact on attack-phase and intraperiplasmic predator viabilities.
The KCN stock solution was diluted into cultures of B. bacteriovorus HD100 to achieve the desired concentration. These cultures were then incubated at 30°C and 250 rpm for 24 h, after which the number of surviving B. bacteriovorus HD100 was determined. For the intraperiplasmic studies, predation of E. coli was performed for 1 h at 30°C and 250 rpm using a PPR of approximately 0.03. At this time, KCN was added to achieve the desired concentration. The number of predators were determined after an additional 3 and 5 h using top agar plates as described previously (52).
Confocal microscopy.
For the microscopic images, we used B. bacteriovorus HD100 bearing plasmid pMQ572, which expresses the Venus yellow fluorescent protein (55), and E. coli expressing the Dsred fluorescent protein via plasmid pHTK3 (56). The pMQ572 plasmid for B. bacteriovorus HD100 was constructed by Robert Shanks’ group and is similar to another construct that expresses the fluorescent tdTomato protein (31, 57). pMQ572 was introduced into B. bacteriovorus HD100 by conjugation as described previously (58) with slight modifications. For these experiments, approximately 2 × 1010 B. bacteriovorus HD100 bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 15 min) and resuspended in 2 ml HEPES. The donor strain, E. coli S17λpir/pMQ572, was grown to stationary phase (16 h) in LB medium with 10 µg/ml gentamicin added at 30°C and 250 rpm. The cells were then pelleted by centrifugation (20 ml, 16,000 × g, 15 min) and resuspended in 2 ml HEPES buffer. Both the donor and recipient (50 μl) were mixed and spotted onto nitrocellulose filters (0.22-μm pore size) (Pall Life Sciences, USA), which were placed on top of DNB agar plates. The plates were then incubated overnight at 30°C. After 24 h, the bacteria were resuspended in 2 ml HEPES buffer and serially diluted. These samples were used to prepare DNB top agar plates with E. coli MG1655 harboring pMQ572 as the prey. These plates had 10 μg/ml gentamicin added to them to select for the transconjugants. The plates were incubated at 30°C until plaques were visible. The plaques were then excised, and the recombinant predatory cells were grown in HEPES buffer with gentamicin added using E. coli MG1655/pMQ572 as the prey. It was noticed that when these predatory cell cultures were grown in DNB, they were more fluorescent than cultures in HEPES, and thus, DNB was used to prepare the recombinant cultures for the experiments. Consequently, the predation tests were conducted as described above in DNB except the PPR was approximately 1.0. After 1 h, the culture was divided, and KCN was added to a final concentration of 200 µM. Samples were taken at set times and imaged using a Carl Zeiss LSM 780 multiphoton confocal microscope controlled by ZEN 2012 software.
Statistical analyses.
All experiments were performed at least three times. Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t test to compare two sets of data). For comparing three or more data sets, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed followed by the Tukey posthoc test.
Data availability.
The bacterial strains used in this study are available at various strain repositories (LMG [Belgian Coordinated Collection of Microorganisms], DSM [Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH], and ATCC [American Type and Culture Collection]).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research was sponsored by the National Research Foundation (grant 2016R1D1A1A09919912) and by the U.S. Army Research Office and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement W911NF-15-2-0027.
The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Office, DARPA, or the U.S. Government.
We thank the UOBC facilities at UNIST for use of the equipment and especially Robert Shanks for kindly providing plasmid pMQ572.
W.M., H.K., and R.J.M. designed the experiments. W.M., H.K., H.I., S.Y.C., and A.K.M. performed the experiments. W.M., H.K., H.I., S.Y.C., A.K.M., and R.J.M. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
We declare that we have no conflict of interests related to publishing this article.
Footnotes
Citation Mun W, Kwon H, Im H, Choi SY, Monnappa AK, Mitchell RJ. 2017. Cyanide production by Chromobacterium piscinae shields it from Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 predation. mBio 8:e01370-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01370-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pernthaler J. 2005. Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:537–546. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jousset A, Lara E, Wall LG, Valverde C. 2006. Secondary metabolites help biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 to escape protozoan grazing. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7083–7090. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00557-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matz C, Deines P, Boenigk J, Arndt H, Eberl L, Kjelleberg S, Jürgens K. 2004. Impact of violacein-producing bacteria on survival and feeding of bacterivorous nanoflagellates. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1593–1599. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1593-1599.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matz C, Kjelleberg S. 2005. Off the hook – how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol 13:302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee JH, Kim YG, Kim M, Kim E, Choi H, Kim Y, Lee J. 2017. Indole-associated predator-prey interactions between the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 19:1776–1790. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dwidar M, Nam D, Mitchell RJ. 2015. Indole negatively impacts predation by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus and its release from the bdelloplast. Environ Microbiol 17:1009–1022. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee J, Jayaraman A, Wood TK. 2007. Indole is an inter-species biofilm signal mediated by SdiA. BMC Microbiol 7:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee JH, Lee J. 2010. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:426–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Karlin DA, Mastromarino AJ, Jones RD, Stroehlein JR, Lorentz O. 1985. Fecal skatole and indole and breath methane and hydrogen in patients with large bowel polyps or cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 109:135–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00391888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bansal T, Alaniz RC, Wood TK, Jayaraman A. 2010. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:228–233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906112107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wrede F, Swane W. 1937. Über das Violacein, den violetten Farbstoff des Bacillus violaceus. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archiv Exp Pathol Pharmakol 186:532–538. doi: 10.1007/BF01929687. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lichstein HC, Van De Sand VF. 1945. Violacein, an antibiotic pigment produced by Chromobacterium violaceum. J Infect Dis 76:47–51. doi: 10.1093/infdis/76.1.47. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Masuelli L, Pantanella F, La Regina G, Benvenuto M, Fantini M, Mattera R, Di Stefano E, Mattei M, Silvestri R, Schippa S, Manzari V, Modesti A, Bei R. 2016. Violacein, an indole-derived purple-colored natural pigment produced by Janthinobacterium lividum, inhibits the growth of head and neck carcinoma cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. Tumour Biol 37:3705–3717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pantanella F, Berlutti F, Passariello C, Sarli S, Morea C, Schippa S. 2007. Violacein and biofilm production in Janthinobacterium lividum. J Appl Microbiol 102:992–999. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hakvåg S, Fjaervik E, Klinkenberg G, Borgos SE, Josefsen KD, Ellingsen TE, Zotchev SB. 2009. Violacein-producing Collimonas sp. from the sea surface microlayer of coastal waters in Trondelag, Norway. Mar Drugs 7:576–588. doi: 10.3390/md7040576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang HS, Jiang PX, Lu Y, Ruan ZY, Jiang RB, Xing XH, Lou K, Wei D. 2009. Optimization of culture conditions for violacein production by a new strain of Duganella sp. B2. Biochem Eng J 44:119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi SY, Kim S, Lyuck S, Kim SB, Mitchell RJ. 2015. High-level production of violacein by the newly isolated Duganella violaceinigra str. NI28 and its impact on Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep 5:15598. doi: 10.1038/srep15598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moss MO, Ryall C. 1981. Distribution of chromobacteria in a lowland river. Microb Ecol 7:139–149. doi: 10.1007/BF02032496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Riveros R, Haun M, Durán N. 1989. Effect of growth conditions on production of violacein by Chromobacterium violaceum (BB-78 strain). Braz J Med Biol Res 22:569–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aruldass CA, Masalamany SRL, Venil CK, Ahmad WA. 2017. Antibacterial mode of action of violacein from Chromobacterium violaceum UTM5 against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8855-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Subramaniam S, Ravi V, Sivasubramanian A. 2014. Synergistic antimicrobial profiling of violacein with commercial antibiotics against pathogenic micro-organisms. Pharm Biol 52:86–90. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2013.815634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matz C, Webb JS, Schupp PJ, Phang SY, Penesyan A, Egan S, Steinberg P, Kjelleberg S. 2008. Marine biofilm bacteria evade eukaryotic predation by targeted chemical defense. PLoS One 3:e2744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Swem LR, Swem DL, O’Loughlin CT, Gatmaitan R, Zhao B, Ulrich SM, Bassler BL. 2009. A quorum-sensing antagonist targets both membrane-bound and cytoplasmic receptors and controls bacterial pathogenicity. Mol Cell 35:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ballestriero F, Daim M, Penesyan A, Nappi J, Schleheck D, Bazzicalupo P, Di Schiavi E, Egan S. 2014. Antinematode activity of violacein and the role of the insulin/IGF-1 pathway in controlling violacein sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 9:e109201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Michaels R, Hankes LV, Corpe WA. 1965. Cyanide formation from glycine by nonproliferating cells of Chromobacterium violaceum. Arch Biochem Biophys 111:121–125. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(65)90329-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brysk MM, Lauinger C, Ressler C. 1969. Biosynthesis of cyanide from [2-14C-15N]glycine in Chromobacterium violaceum. Biochim Biophys Acta 184:583–588. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(69)90272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leavesley HB, Li L, Prabhakaran K, Borowitz JL, Isom GE. 2008. Interaction of cyanide and nitric oxide with cytochrome c oxidase: implications for acute cyanide toxicity. Toxicol Sci 101:101–111. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wissing F. 1974. Cyanide formation from oxidation of glycine of Pseudomonas species. J Bacteriol 117:1289–1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Castric PA. 1977. Glycine metabolism by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: hydrogen cyanide biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 130:826–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gallagher LA, Manoil C. 2001. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 kills Caenorhabditis elegans by cyanide poisoning. J Bacteriol 183:6207–6214. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6207-6214.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and avoidance of a natural product from the pathogenic bacterium Serratia marcescens by Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:2295–2300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610281104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pujol N, Link EM, Liu LX, Kurz CL, Alloing G, Tan MW, Ray KP, Solari R, Johnson CD, Ewbank JJ. 2001. A reverse genetic analysis of components of the Toll signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 11:809–821. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00241-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Burlinson P, Studholme D, Cambray-Young J, Heavens D, Rathjen J, Hodgkin J, Preston GM. 2013. Pseudomonas fluorescens NZI7 repels grazing by C. elegans, a natural predator. ISME J 7:1126–1138. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Frangipani E, Pérez-Martínez I, Williams HD, Cherbuin G, Haas D. 2014. A novel cyanide-inducible gene cluster helps protect Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cyanide. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:28–34. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lambert C, Evans KJ, Till R, Hobley L, Capeness M, Rendulic S, Schuster SC, Aizawa S, Sockett RE. 2006. Characterizing the flagellar filament and the role of motility in bacterial prey-penetration by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Mol Microbiol 60:274–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05081.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shepherd G, Velez LI. 2008. Role of hydroxocobalamin in acute cyanide poisoning. Ann Pharmacother 42:661–669. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Riou B, Baud FJ, Astier A, Barriot P, Lecarpentier Y. 1990. In vitro demonstration of the antidotal efficacy of hydroxocobalamin in cyanide poisoning. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2:296–304. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199012000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jurkevitch E, Minz D, Ramati B, Barel G. 2000. Prey range characterization, ribotyping, and diversity of soil and rhizosphere Bdellovibrio spp. isolated on phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2365–2371. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2365-2371.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoshino T. 2011. Violacein and related tryptophan metabolites produced by Chromobacterium violaceum: biosynthetic mechanism and pathway for construction of violacein core. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1463–1475. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3468-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.August PR, Grossman TH, Minor C, Draper MP, MacNeil IA, Pemberton JM, Call KM, Holt D, Osburne MS. 2000. Sequence analysis and functional characterization of the violacein biosynthetic pathway from Chromobacterium violaceum. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2:513–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Michaels R, Corpe WA. 1965. Cyanide formation by Chromobacterium violaceum. J Bacteriol 89:106–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Niven DF, Collins PA, Knowles CJ. 1975. The respiratory system of Chromobacterium violaceum grown under conditions of high and low cyanide evolution. J Gen Microbiol 90:271–285. doi: 10.1099/00221287-90-2-271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Castric PA. 1975. Hydrogen cyanide, a secondary metabolite of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can J Microbiol 21:613–618. doi: 10.1139/m75-088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Siddiqui IA, Shaukat SS, Sheikh IH, Khan A. 2006. Role of cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 in the suppression of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica in tomato. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:641–650. doi: 10.1007/s11274-005-9084-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Neidig N, Paul RJ, Scheu S, Jousset A. 2011. Secondary metabolites of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 drive complex non-trophic interactions with bacterivorous nematodes. Microb Ecol 61:853–859. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9821-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blumer C, Haas D. 2000. Mechanism, regulation, and ecological role of bacterial cyanide biosynthesis. Arch Microbiol 173:170–177. doi: 10.1007/s002039900127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Simpson FJ, Robinson J. 1968. Some energy-producing systems in Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, strain 6-5-S. Can J Biochem 46:865–873. doi: 10.1139/o68-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Friedberg D, Friedberg I. 1976. Membrane-associated, energy-linked reactions in Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. J Bacteriol 127:1382–1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Faust MA, Doetsch RN. 1969. Effect of respiratory inhibitors on the motility of Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Bacteriol 97:806–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tsuchido T, Yasunaga K, Matsumura Y, Oku K. 1996. Use of a tumbling-defective mutant of Escherichia coli for evaluation of pollutant toxicity by computer-assisted image analysis of bacterial motion. Biocontrol Sci 1:61–63. doi: 10.4265/bio.1.61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Im H, Kim D, Ghim CM, Mitchell RJ. 2014. Shedding light on microbial predator-prey population dynamics using a quantitative bioluminescence assay. Microb Ecol 67:167–176. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0323-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Monnappa AK, Dwidar M, Mitchell RJ. 2013. Application of bacterial predation to mitigate recombinant bacterial populations and their DNA. Soil Biol Biochem 57:427–435. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Blom D, Fabbri C, Eberl L, Weisskopf L. 2011. Volatile-mediated killing of Arabidopsis thaliana by bacteria is mainly due to hydrogen cyanide. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1000–1008. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01968-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guilbault GG, Kramer DN. 1966. Ultra sensitive, specific method for cyanide using p-nitrobenzaldehyde and o-dinitrobenzene. Anal Chem 38:834–836. doi: 10.1021/ac60239a009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nagai T, Ibata K, Park ES, Kubota M, Mikoshiba K, Miyawaki A. 2002. A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat Biotechnol 20:87–90. doi: 10.1038/nbt0102-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tomlin KL, Clark SRD, Ceri H. 2004. Green and red fluorescent protein vectors for use in biofilm studies of the intrinsically resistant Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Microbiol Methods 57:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mukherjee S, Brothers KM, Shanks RMQ, Kadouri DE. 2015. Visualizing Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus by using the tdTomato fluorescent protein. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:1653–1661. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03611-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Roschanski N, Strauch E. 2011. Assessment of the mobilizable vector plasmids pSUP202 and pSUP404.2 as genetic tools for the predatory bacterium Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Curr Microbiol 62:589–596. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9748-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The bacterial strains used in this study are available at various strain repositories (LMG [Belgian Coordinated Collection of Microorganisms], DSM [Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH], and ATCC [American Type and Culture Collection]).