Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;70(6):407–414. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v70i6.1708

Table 2.

Decontamination Efficacy* and Relative Cleaning Effectiveness of Cleaning Solutions on Biological Safety Cabinet Workbenches Intentionally Contaminated by a Predetermined Amount of Cyclophosphamide

Cleaning Solution and Cleaning Session Decontamination Efficacy (%) (mean ± SD) Relative Cleaning Effectiveness (%) (mean ± SD)
Quaternary ammonium (DR-100)
1 98.710 ± 1.484 98.710 ± 1.483
2 99.938 ± 0.055 93.814 ± 2.070
3 99.989 ± 0.005 77.076 ± 13.951
4 99.996 ± 0.002 53.741 ± 25.344
5 99.997 ± 0.001 24.892 ± 15.577

Sodium hypochlorite 0.02% (Zochlor)
1 97.027 ± 1.596 97.027 ± 1.597
2 99.935 ± 0.042 97.933 ± 0.456
3 99.992 ± 0.003 84.150 ± 6.949
4 99.998 ± 0.002 67.167 ± 29.225
5 99.997 ± 0.001 3.151 ± 17.532

Sodium hypochlorite 2% (Zochlor)
1 98.008 ± 2.201 98.008 ± 2.201
2 99.935 ± 0.071 96.831 ± 2.893
3 99.992 ± 0.014 82.906 ± ND
4 99.994 ± 0.011 ND
5 100.000 ± 0.000 ND

ND = not determined, SD = standard deviation.

*

Decontamination efficacy (DE, as %) was calculated for each cleaning solution as

DE = 100 − [(CP)M/(CP)T], where (CP)M = measured concentration of cyclophosphamide (pg/cm2) and (CP)T = theoretical concentration of cyclophosphamide (pg/cm2).

Relative cleaning effectiveness (RCE, as %) was calculated for each cleaning solution as RCE = 100 − [(q(cs+1)/q(cs)) × 100], where q is the measured quantity of cyclophosphamide on the workbench (pg) and cs is the cleaning session (1 ≤ n ≤ 5).