Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;68(666):e63–e72. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X694169

Table 5.

Avoidable delays (n = 15 369)a

Avoidable delay,bn (%) Not known, n
Total 3380 (22.0) 1673

Male 1839 (24.0) 897

Female 1541 (20.0) 776

Age group, years
  0–24 39 (22.9) 28
  25–49 338 (21.6) 140
  50–64 766 (20.3) 379
  65–74 937 (21.2) 448
  75–84 931 (24.6) 436
  ≥85 369 (22.2) 242

Cancer site
  Bladder 109 (24.4) 43
  Brain 38 (16.9) 40
  Breast 178 (6.9) 146
  Cancer of unknown primary 95 (28.3) 64
  Colon 339 (28.7) 139
  Endometrial 92 (24.2) 20
  Leukaemia 60 (14.7) 62
  Liver 48 (19.5) 26
  Lung 447 (24.0) 267
  Lymphoma 171 (26.3) 90
  Melanoma 151 (18.9) 38
  Multiple myeloma 63 (27.3) 41
  Oesophageal 112 (27.2) 35
  Oral/oropharyngeal 63 (28.5) 47
  Other 387 (28.2) 209
  Ovarian 89 (29.6) 31
  Pancreatic 129 (31.6) 52
  Prostate 429 (22.0) 183
  Rectal 177 (29.2) 41
  Renal 110 (22.2) 61
  Stomach 93 (34.4) 38
a

If there was a perceived avoidable delay in the patient receiving their diagnosis, the following questions gathered information about the nature of that delay, considering three key dimensions: where it occurred, the stage of the diagnostic process during which it occurred, and to whom or what factor it was attributable. Delay was defined as an unnecessary prolongation of the time to reach a diagnosis that has potentially adverse consequences on outcomes.

b

Screening and not applicable cases are excluded from the avoidable delay category. Percentage values relate to observations with non-missing information (that is, excluding ‘not-known’). This is to prevent under-reporting of the proportion of the known categories by assuming that the not known cases are missing at random and therefore evenly distributed among the known groups.