Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;68(666):e9–e17. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X694097

Table 1.

Standardised coefficients for the association between practice-level GP Patient Survey scores and diagnostic activity indicatorsa,b

Indicators Q4: Helpful receptionists Q12: Access to appointments Q9: Ability to see a preferred doctor Q21: Composite doctor communication Q23: Composite nurse communication communication

OR/RR (95% CI) P OR/RR (95% CI) P OR/RR (95% CI) P OR/RR (95% CI) P OR/RR (95% CI) P





Process indicators
Sigmoidoscopy rate 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) <0.0001 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.0087 0.97 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.0002 1.05 (1.03 to 1.06) <0.0001 1.02 (1.01 to 1.04) 0.0065
Colonoscopy rate 1.00 (0.98 to 1.01) 0.8293 0.97 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.0002 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) 0.0001 1.04 (1.03 to 1.05) <0.0001 1.01 (1.00 to 1.02) 0.2031
Gastroscopy rate 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00) 0.0300 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98) <0.0001 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) <0.0001 1.07 (1.06 to 1.08) <0.0001 1.01 (1.00 to 1.03) 0.0183
Urgent referralc rate 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00) 0.0704 0.99 (0.98 to 1.01) 0.3887 0.86 (0.86 to 0.87) <0.0001 1.11 (1.09 to 1.12) <0.0001 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04) 0.0001
Urgent referralc rate (colorectal) 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.0082 1.00 (0.98 to 1.02) 0.8047 0.86 (0.85 to 0.88) <0.0001 1.12 (1.11 to 1.14) <0.0001 1.01 (1.00 to 1.03) 0.1408
Urgent referralc rate (lung) 0.99 (0.97 to 1.02) 0.6580 0.98 (0.96 to 1.01) 0.1800 0.92 (0.90 to 0.93) <0.0001 1.08 (1.05 to 1.10) <0.0001 1.01 (0.98 to 1.03) 0.6400
Urgent referralc rate (skin) 1.00 (0.97 to 1.02) 0.6808 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) 0.0650 0.87 (0.85 to 0.88) <0.0001 1.08 (1.06 to 1.11) <0.0001 1.04 (1.02 to 1.06) 0.0004
Urgent referralc rate (breast) 1.02 (1.00 to 1.03) 0.0697 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00) 0.1286 0.91 (0.89 to 0.92) <0.0001 1.04 (1.02 to 1.05) <0.0001 1.03 (1.02 to 1.05) <0.0001

Outcome indicators
Urgent referralc conversion rate 1.00 (0.99 to 1.02) 0.5372 1.00 (0.99 to 1.02) 0.5526 1.09 (1.07 to 1.10) <0.0001 0.96 (0.95 to 0.98) <0.0001 1.01 (0.99 to 1.02) 0.4287
Urgent referralc detection rate 1.01 (0.99 to 1.02) 0.5714 1.01 (0.99 to 1.03) 0.2695 0.95 (0.94 to 0.97) <0.0001 1.06 (1.05 to 1.08) <0.0001 0.99 (0.97 to 1.01) 0.3171
Emergency route to diagnosis 1.02 (1.00 to 1.04) 0.0312 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) 0.0145 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.7575 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) <0.0001 1.00 (0.98 to 1.02) 0.9196
Referred route to diagnosis 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) 0.0031 1.02 (1.01 to 1.04) 0.0096 0.97 (0.96–0.99) 0.0002 1.03 (1.02 to 1.05) <0.0001 1.01 (1.00 to 1.03) 0.0879
Other route to diagnosis 1.01 (0.99 to 1.03) 0.2651 0.99 (0.97 to 1.02) 0.5776 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.0002 1.00 (0.98 to 1.01) 0.6434 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) 0.0739
a

The results are from ‘multivariate’ models including practice scores for all five aspects of experience shown and adjusted by the age–sex–deprivation make-up of practice populations. The main exposure variables for GP Patient Survey items are standardised coefficients (shrunken z scores) instead of the observed practice scores.

b

The associations highlighted in bold correspond to odds ratio/rate ratio valuesa 4% difference from parity (that is,0.96 or1.04).

c

Urgent referral for suspected cancer is also known as ‘2-week wait’ referral. CI = confidence interval. OR = odds ratio. RR = rate ratio.