Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 22;6:e26517. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26517

Table 2. Electrophysiology in mature mouse GCs – experiment vs. model.

Intrinsic properties Experiment Model reconstr. morphologies Model synth. morphologies
Rin [MΩ] (@ −82.1 mV) 289.5 ± 34.9 287.0 ± 14.7 279.6 ± 6.9
cm [pF] 48.9 ± 5.3 55.7 ± 2.8 61.2 ± 1.6
tau [ms] 34.0 ± 2.0 31.4 ± 0.2 31.6 ± 0.1
Vrest [mV] −92.7 ± 0.5 * −88.7 ± 0.1 −88.6 ± 0.0
Ithreshold [pA] 47.5 ± 4.5 52.5 ± 3.7 50.3 ± 1.6
Vthreshold [mV] −46.3 ± 1.6 * −44.9 ± 0.3 −43.8 ± 0.2
AP amplitude [mV] 95.6 ± 2.1 96.3 ± 2.9 97.7 ± 1.7
AP width [ms] 1.03 ± 0.02 1.00 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.02
fAHP [mV] 15.7 ± 1.4 17.5 ± 1.7 15.8 ± 0.8
Interspike interval [ms] 36.3 ± 4.9 36.2 ± 3.2 34.5 ± 1.1
Max. spike slope [V/s] 450.1 ± 23.7 428.0 ± 39.5 519.7 ± 24.9
gKir [nS] 5.46 ± 1.31 5.90 ± 0.89 5.97 ± 0.6

*after subtraction of a calculated liquid junction potential of 12.1 mV.