Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):e0189737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189737

Genetic structure and diversity of Nodularia douglasiae (Bivalvia: Unionida) from the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage

Xiongjun Liu 1,2, Yanling Cao 3, Taotao Xue 3, Ruiwen Wu 3, Yu Zhou 3, Chunhua Zhou 3, David T Zanatta 4,*, Shan Ouyang 3,*, Xiaoping Wu 1,2,3,*
Editor: John A Craft5
PMCID: PMC5738091  PMID: 29261733

Abstract

The Yangtze River drainage in China is among the most species rich rivers for freshwater mussels (order Unionida) on Earth with at least 68 species known. The freshwater mussels of the Yangtze River face a variety of threats with indications that species are declining in abundance and area of occupancy. This study represents the first analyses of the genetic structure and diversity for the common and widespread freshwater mussel Nodularia douglasiae based on microsatellite DNA genotypes and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Phylogenetic analysis a fragment of the COI mitochondrial gene indicated that N. douglasiae collected from across the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage are monophyletic with N. douglasiae from Japan, Russia, and South Korea. The results of the analysis of both the mtDNA and microsatellite datasets indicated that the seven collection locations of N. douglasiae in the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage showed high genetic diversity, significant genetic differentiation and genetic structure, and stable population dynamics over time. Moreover, we found that the connections among tributaries rivers and lakes in the Yangtze River drainage were important in maintaining gene flow among locations that N. douglasiae inhabits. An understanding of the genetic structure and diversity of a widespread species like N. douglasiae could be used as a surrogate to better understand the populations of other freshwater mussel species that are more rare in the Yangtze River drainage. At the same time, these results could provide a basis for the protection of genetic diversity and management of unionid mussels diversity and other aquatic organisms in the system.

Introduction

Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) are one of the most important faunas in freshwater ecosystems, for their potential to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (e.g., nutrient cycling and creating habitat for other benthic organisms)[14]. However, freshwater mussels are one of the most critically endangered faunal groups and are globally in decline[1,5]. Freshwater mussels also have an unusual life cycle, requiring a host fish species for larval (glochidia) development and dispersal[6]. This complex life cycle has the potential to drive genetic isolation between populations[7]. The obligate parasitic life stage may lead to phylogeographic patterns of conservation importance.

The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are a center for freshwater mussel diversity in East Asia with 68 described species[811]. However, in these regions, more than 80% of freshwater mussels are considered to be threatened or near threatened, and the dominant taxa of bivalves have shifted from large-sized unionids to the small-sized corbuculid clams (Cyrenidae)[1213]. The decline of freshwater mussels diversity and abundance in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River may be attributed to a variety of threats[810,1214]: 1) fluctuations in water levels in river and lake levels coinciding with wet and dry seasons have become more extreme as a result of dam construction in the watershed and possibly due to human-induced climate change–these water level fluctutations may be very important in structuring habitat, and thus population and assemblage structure of unionid mussels; 2) the construction of large-scale impoundments and sand mining from the river benthos has resulted in destruction of habitats and hindered the abilities of host fish (and glochidia from mussels) to disperse[15]; 3) overharvesting of fish (potentially) acting as hosts for mussels may be affecting the negatively affecting survivorship of unionids; and 4) commercial mussel harvest operations for the production of pearls and buttons is affecting many unionid species. These threats are causing delines in the abundance and distribution of unioinid species in the Yangtze drainage and may be fragmenting the historically more continuous habitats and populations. Due to these ongoing threats and documented declines in mussel populations, gaining an understanding of phylogeography, population structure, and genetic diversity is important for the conservation and management of unionid species in Yangtze River drainage[910,12]. Information on the genetic diversity and structure of natural populations is needed to inform resource managers on how to best mimic natural populations when restoration efforts are implemented. Protecting freshwater mussels in the Yangtze River has become especially important, and conservation and restoration projects should be prioritized to areas with higher genetic diversity when possible and the protection of unique (or endemic) diversity and lineages should they be discovered using genetic analyses[4,16].

Nodularia douglasiae (Griffith & Pidgeon, 1833; Bivalvia: Unionidae) is a relatively common and widespread freshwater mussel in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River drainage, China; the Korean Peninsula; eastern Russia; and in Japan and the Sakhalin islands[1,3,1718]. The large distribution and relatively high abundance of N. douglasiae make it an ideal species for understanding general patterns of freshwater mussel genetic structure in east Asia. Studies on common and widespread unionid species have previously been used as surrogates for better understanding genetic patterns in rare species[1921]. Conservation programs are an integral part of freshwater mussel recovery plans, highlighting the need for large-scale assessment of freshwater mussel genetic structure and diversity[22]. Using this mussel species, the genetic structure of a common and widespread species will assist in the understanding of how drainage patterns have changed over time, and help in making inferences regarding the genetic structure among populations of rarer and/or narrowly distributed species[2324]. In recent years, habitat destruction and human interference caused by large-scale construction projects [25], have threatened aquatic biodiversity, including freshwater mussels, throughout the distribution of N. douglasiae, making it a potentially important sentinel and surrogate species for rare and imperiled unionids in the region. Much of the distribution of N. douglasiae (e.g., the Yangtze River drainage) has numerous natural and anthropogenic features that may have shaped the genetic structure and diversity of this species[25].

Analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequence data provide estimates of the phylogenetic relationships and population evolution in unionid mussels[2628]. Microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSR) are useful markers for the study of deeper genetic diversity patterns in freshwater mussels because of their co-dominance, high mutation rate, and ease of scoring[24, 2931]. Combining analyses of mtDNA sequence data and microsatellite genotypes can help to reveal both the course-scale and fine-scale evolutionary history and genetic structure of a species. This study is the first to study the genetic structure and diversity of N. douglasiae in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and among the first broad-scale studies for any freshwater mussel in the region. Given the historically interconnected nature of the Yangtze River and its tributary rivers and lakes, we hypothesize that the analyses will reveal high levels of genetic diversity and relatively little genetic structure with high levels of gene flow across sampled locations. This study will provide a basis for the protection and management of diversity in unionid mussels in this large river watershed.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All necessary permits were obtained for the described field studies from the Yangtze River Fishery Administration of China. The handling of mussels was conducted in accordance with the guidelines on the care and use of animals for scientific purposes set by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.

Sample collection and DNA extraction

Specimens of N. douglasiae (n = 197) were collected in 2014 and 2016 from Poyang Lake (PY), Donting Lake (DT), Xiannv Lake (XN), Gan River (GJ), Liangzi Lake (LZ), Hongze Lake (HZ), Taihu Lake (TH) in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River, China (Table 1 and Fig 1). Tissues of individual specimens were preserved in 95% ethanol and stored at -20°C until DNA extraction. Specimens were deposited in the Nanchang University Museum and assigned accession numbers (NCUXN1-Song-2014~NCUXN8-Song-2014, NCULZ1-Liu-2015~NCULZ8-Liu-2015, NCUPY21-Liu-2015~NCUPY28-Liu-2015, NCUDT1-Liu-2015~NCUDT8-Liu-2015, NCUHZ1-Liu-2016~NCUHZ8-Liu-2016, NCUTH1-Liu-2016~NCUTH8-Liu-2016, NCUGJ1-Liu-2016~NCUGJ16-Liu-2016). The genomic DNA was extracted from mantle tissue using the TINAamp Marine Animals DNA Kit. Concentration and quality of extracted DNA were estimated using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis.

Table 1. Sample sizes and distribution information of N. douglasiae collected from the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage.

Collection location Site code Latitude Longitude Sample size
Microsatellite
genotypes
Sample size
mtDNA COI sequences
Dongting Lake DT N29.126 E113.022 34 8
Poyang Lake PY N28.883 E116.292 32 8
Gan River GJ N28.663 E115.878 32 16
Xiannv Lake XN N27.733 E114.804 29 8
Hongze Lake HZ N33.298 E118.887 30 8
Taihu Lake TH N31.433 E120.331 30 8
Liangzi Lake LZ N30.256 E114.590 10 8

Fig 1. Collection locations for N. douglasiae in the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage.

Fig 1

LZ: Liangzi Lake; DT: Dongting Lake; PY: Poyang Lake; GJ: Gan River; XN: Xiannv Lake; HZ: Hongze Lake; TH: Taihu Lake. Collection location symbol colours correspond to Fig 6 (K = 3).

PCR amplification

Mitochondrial DNA amplification

The cytochrome c oxidase subunit-I (COI) primer: the forward primer sequence was LCO22me2 (5′-GGTCAACAAAYCATAARGATATTGG-3′), the reverse primer sequence was HCO700DY2 (5′-TCAGGGTGACCAAAAAAYCA-3′). Each primer pair was screened for reliable amplification using 64 individuals of N. douglasiae. The PCR reaction was carried out in a 25 μL volume containing 12.5 μL 2x Taq PCR MasterMix (TianGen); 8.5 μL ddH2O; 1.0 μL of 10 μM forward primer; 1.0 μL of 10 μM reverse primer; and 2 μL genomic DNA (about 100 ng/μL). PCR amplifications were conducted with the following touchdown thermal cycling program: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, annealing temperature of 50°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel to confirm successful amplification and then purified using an EZ-10 Spin Column PCR Product Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The purified DNA was then sequenced on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA).

Microsatellite locus amplification

We used 13 primer sets for PCR amplification of microsatellite loci (S1 Table). A description of the development and initial screening of 14 new microsatellite loci (12 of which were used in this study) for N. douglasiae is included in Supporting Information (S1 File). One of the 13 loci (scasst17) used was developed for Solenaia carinata (Heude, 1877)[32]. Each primer pair was screened for reliable amplification using 197 individuals of N. douglasiae. The PCR reaction was carried out in a 20 μL volume containing 10 μL 2x Taq PCR MasterMix (TianGen); 6.4 μL water; 0.6 μL of 10 μM HEX-, TAMRA-, or 6-FAM-labeled M13 universal primer; 1.0 μL of 10 μM forward primer with an M13 tag on the 5′ end; 1.0 μL of 10 μM reverse primer; and 2 μL genomic DNA (about 50 ng/μL). PCR amplifications were conducted with the following touchdown thermal cycling program: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 10–15 cycles of 94°C for 30s, locus-specific annealing temperature ranging between 52°C and 65°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s, at the same time, 20 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, locus-specific annealing temperature 53°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. All loci were run separately on an ABI3730 automated sequencer and alleles were scored using a TAMRA-labeled size standard[33] using GENEMAPPER v. 3.7 (Applied Biosystems).

Data analyses

Mitochondrial DNA

The sequences of the mtDNA COI fragment in 64 samples were aligned using Clustal X1.81[34]. DNASP 5.0 [35] was used to analyse nucleotide composition, number of polymorphic sites (S), average numbers of pairwise nucleotide differences, haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) for each collection location.

To test the monophyly of the N. douglasiae COI haplotypes from the middle and lower Yangtze drainage, a phylogenetic analysis using Bayesian inference was performed using MRBAYES v.3.2.2 [36]. The initial model of evolution (HKY+G) was determined by comparing 24 models of evolution in MRMODELTEST v.2.2[37]. MRBAYES was run using 3,000,000 generations and six concurrent Markov Chains and 2 hot chains sampled at intervals of every 100 generations for a total of 30,000 trees. A 25% burn-in (7500 trees) was used to ensure stationarity of the log likelihood values. In addition to the 37 COI haplotypes from the middle and lower Yangtze, COI sequences from other putative N. douglasiae from Russia, Japan, and South Korea [18] were included (S4 Table). Also included in the phylogenetic analyses were COI sequences for N. nuxpersicae [11], N. nipponensis [18], and N. sinuolata [18] (S4 Table). As outgroups for the Nodularia dataset, COI sequences available in GenBank from 10 species were used (S4 Table).

To visualize the relationships among the N. douglasiae COI haplotypes from the middle and lower Yangtze, a haplotype network was constructed using a TCS algorithm[38] in POPART[39] with a 95% connection limit and gaps defined as missing data.

Patterns of genetic structure in the COI dataset were evaluated using a hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA). The AMOVA was used to partition variance components to populations and to individuals within each collection location, where 1000 permutations were performed to test the significance of each pairwise population comparison. A test for isolation-by-distance was conducted by testing the significance of a correlation between pairwise Nei’s D (calculated using ARLEQUIN[40]) and geographic distance among sampling locations. The correlation computations between pairwise genetic and geographic distances between populations were analysed using a Mantel test[41]. Geographic distance was meansured among collection sites by measuring distances following waterways in ArcMap GIS (ESRI).

Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs tests were conducted through Arlequin 3.5[40], to examine deviations from neutrality. DNASP 5.0[35] was used to analyse mismatch distribution analysis (MDA). A Bayesian Skyline Plot (BSP)[42] analysis was computed in BEAST 1.4.7[43]. The BSP was used to reconstruct the effective population size fluctuations since the time of the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA). MCMC was run for 500 million steps, with sampling every 1000 generations and following a ‘burn-in’ of the initial 10% cycles. Inspections of the results and construction of the BSP were conducted using TRACER 1.5[44]. The fit of the constant size population model and Bayesian Skyline coalescent models to dataset was assessed using the Model Comparison function in TRACER 1.5.

Microsatellite DNA

The number of alleles (NA), the effective number of alleles (NE), observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE), and tests for deviation from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) were calculated using POPGENE, v1.32[45]. CERVUS 3.03[46] was used to calculated polymorphism information content (PIC). Using MICRO-CHECKER v. 2.2.3[47] to detect possible null alleles from each collection location.

In order to detect any recent genetic bottlenecks (within 2Ne− 4Ne generations), four tests with varying degrees of sensitivity were conducted using BOTTLENECK v. 1.2.02[48]. Wilcoxon sign rank tests were carried out using three models of evolution: the infinite alleles model (IAM), two-phase model (TPM), and stepwise mutation model (SMM). A mode-shift test was conducted to identify significant changes in allelic frequency caused by a genetic bottleneck.

Using STRUCTURE v. 2.3.3[49] population structure was assessed in the study area. Ten iterations, allowing for admixture among genetic groups (K) and assuming correlated allele frequencies, were run for each value of K (number of clusters) which was defined by the number of collection locations for each species: the maximum value of K was calculated by adding 3 to the number of collection locations (i.e., K = 1–10) to allow detection of substructure within sampling locations. Each trial used an initial burn-in period of 200,000 replicates, followed by an additional 200,000 replicates after burn-in to ensure stationarity. To determine optimal solutions for potential numbers of genetic groups (K) within each species[50], calculating ΔK from STRUCTURE output in combination with the log likelihood of the solution for each value of K using STRUCTURE HARVESTER v. 0.6.8[51]. To further evaluate and visualize the geographic genetic structure among collection locations, a principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was conducted using GenAlEx 6.5[52] to ordinate genetic distance estimates[53] calculated for the genotypic data of individuals used.

An analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA)[54] was run using GenAlEx to test the statistical significance of genetic divergences within and among collection locations in each population. Pairwise analyses of genetic divergence (FST and Jost’s D)[55] among sampling locations were calculated using GenAlEx. Geneflow was estimated by calculating number of migrants per generation (Nm) using GenAlEx. A test for isolation-by-distance was conducted by testing the significance of a correlation between pairwise Nei’s D (calculated using GenAlEx) and geographic distance among sampling locations. The correlation computations between pairwise genetic and geographic distances between populations were analysed using a Mantel test [41]. Geographic distance was meansured among collection sites by measuring distances following waterways in ArcMap GIS (ESRI).

Results

Mitochondrial DNA

From the 64 sequenced individuals collected from 7 locations in the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage, 37 unique COI haplotypes were identified (GenBank Accession Nos. MG210495-MG210558). The Gan River had the greatest variation with 13 haplotypes, and the lowest was Poyang Lake with 4 haplotypes (Table 2). Haplotypes diversity values at each population varied between 0.857 and 0.975 (Table 2). The Gan River had the greatest haplotype diversity (0.975), and the lowest was Poyang Lake (0.857). Nucleotide diversity values ranged from 0.00726 to 0.04592 (Table 2). Poyang Lake had the greatest nucleotide diversity (0.04592), and the lowest was Liangzi Lake (0.00926).

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of COI for each collection site of N. douglasiae collection locations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Sample site N H Hd π
DT 8 7 0.964 0.01726
LZ 8 7 0.964 0.00926
PY 8 4 0.857 0.04592
GJ 16 13 0.975 0.02728
XN 8 6 0.929 0.03448
HZ 8 6 0.929 0.03777
TH 8 7 0.964 0.01392
Total 64 37 0.976 0.03192

Site codes as in Table 1. N = number sequenced, H = number of haplotypes, Hd = haplotype diversity, π = mean nucleotide diversity.

Phylogenetic analyses (Fig 2) showed strong support for the monophyly of Nodularia (posterior probability = 1.00). Nodularia nuxpersicae and N. nipponensis were found to nest within the 37 N. douglasiae haplotypes sequenced from the Yangtze and additional N. douglasiae COI sequences from Japan, Russia, and South Korea. The 37 COI haplotype sequences from the Yangtze drainage in combination with Nodularia COI sequences from GenBank formed three clades: three haplotypes restricted to Xiannv Lake, Poyang Lake, and the Gan River (H15, H16, and H29); a single haplotype found in two individuals from Hongze Lake (H31); N. nuxpersicae, N. nipponensis and the remaining 33 haplotypes formed the largest clade. Nodularia sinuolata from South Korea was sister to all of the remaining Nodularia COI seqeuences.

Fig 2. Phylogenetic tree of the COI fragment for Nodularia obtained using Bayesian Inference (BI).

Fig 2

Support values represent BI posterior probabilities. Only support values above 0.50 are shown.

Using the TCS algorithm, POPART software produced a single haplotype network (Fig 3). The most frequent haplotype (H16) occurred in 6 individuals and was shared by individuals in the Gan River, Poyang Lake, and Xiannv Lake. Twenty-three haplotypes were rare and occurred in just a single individual. As seen in the phylogeny (Fig 2), for the most part, the haplotypes show little geographic structure. However, a unique group of haplotypes (H32, H33, H34, H35, and H37) were found in Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake, the easternmost collections.

Fig 3. Haplotype network for N. douglasiae populations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Fig 3

Each cross-hatched line represents one base-pair difference between haplotypes, black dots are inferred missing haplotypes, and haplotype frequency is relative to the size of the circle. Collection location codes as in Table 1. Colours used are in similar hues (blue, green, red) corresponding to the results of the STRUCTURE analysis (K = 3, Fig 6).

The AMOVA results showed that 11.99% of the total genetic variance was among the seven collection locations, and among sampling location differentiation was significant (overall FST = 0.1874, p<0.001, Table 3). Pairwise FST ranged from -0.025 to 0.393 among the collection locations (Table 4).

Table 3. Analysis of molecular variation (AMOVA) calculated from COI mtDNA sequences for N. douglasiae from seven collection locations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Source of variation df Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation
Among populations 6 158.375 1.979 11.99
Within populations 57 489.250 8.583 88.01
Total 63 647.625 10.562

All F-statistics were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Table 4. Analysis of genetic differentiation coefficient (Fst) calculated using COI mtDNA sequence data among seven collection locations of Nodularia douglasiae from the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage.

LZ DT PY GJ XN HZ TH
LZ
DT -0.026
PY 0.357 0.360
GJ -0.022 -0.014 0.186
XN 0.383 0.393 0.120 0.212
HZ 0.172 0.182 0.150 0.076 0.152
TH 0.197 0.243 0.348 0.096 0.365 0.087

Bold type indicates statistical significance after Bonferonni correction (α = 0.002381).

Genetic differentiation as represented by pairwise genetic distance values among the seven collection locations was not correlated with geographic water distance indicating that more geographically distant site combinations did not produce higher levels of genetic differentiation (p = 0.5020).

The mismatch distribution of analysis pairwise differences was significantly different from the expected distribution of the expanding population model (Fig 4). Similarly there was a lack of statistical significance of Tajima’s D test (p<0.01), and non-significant Fu's FS (p<0.01). Moreover, when all samples were pooled together, Tajima’s D and Fu's FS test were not significant (p<0.01, Table 5). Additionally, the BSPs showed that N. douglasiae has had a stable historical population size with a small recent expansion event occurring between 250,000 and 300,000 years (Fig 5). However, the model comparison analysis showed that constant population size was the best fit for the model to the data set, suggesting that there was not much support for the recent expansion trend.

Fig 4. Mismatch distribution analysis (MDA) for N. douglasiae collection locations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Fig 4

Table 5. Neutrality tests for N. douglasiae collection locations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River (P<0.01).

Site codes as in Table 1.

Collection locations Sample size Pi(%) Tajima's D Fu's FS Mismatch distribution
PSSD PRAG
DT 8 4.679 -0.339 -2.067 0.800 0.950
LZ 8 5.964 -0.171 -1.507 0.350 0.280
PY 8 29.571 2.406 8.293 0.600 0.440
GJ 16 17.567 -0.955 -0.797 0.580 0.890
XN 8 28.642 2.305 3.225 0.120 0.920
HZ 8 24.321 0.790 2.842 0.230 0.930
TH 8 8.964 0.844 -0.666 0.400 0.790
All collection locations 64 20.559 -0.194 -3.556 0.360 0.710

Fig 5. Bayesian skyline plot for N. douglasiae from the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage reconstructing the population size history using an evolutionary rate of 2.0 × 10−8 substitutions/site/year.

Fig 5

Microsatellite DNA

A total of 197 individuals of N. douglasiae were successfully genotyped for all 13 microsatellite loci. The results showed that 434 alleles were detected among the seven collection locations. The number of alleles (NA) at each sampling location ranged from 3.231 to 5.692, the effective number of alleles (NE) ranged from 2.223 to 2.538, observed heterozygocity (Ho) ranged from 0.454 to 0.522, expected heterozygosity (HE) ranged from 0.442 to 0.531, and polymorphic information criterion (PIC) ranged from 0.435 to 0.477 (Table 6). Deviations from HWE were found at only 8 of 91 locus-collection site combinations loci after a Bonferonni correction and were not consistently found at any site or locus (S2 Table). Significant tests for null alleles occurred in 8 of the loci used, however the estimated null allele frequencies were generally low ranging from 0.000 to 0.2792 at any given collection location-locus combination (S3 Table). The only locus where null alleles were consistently detected at levels that could potentially affect the outcomes of population-level results[5657] was locus Udo14. Analyses (e.g., STRUCTURE) were rerun without locus Udo14 and were found to give similar patterns to the results run with this locus, thus locus Udo14 was kept for all analyses.

Table 6. Population genetic parameters in seven populations of N. douglasiae in the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage calculated using 13 microsatellites.

Genetic parameters LZ DT PY GJ XN HZ TH
N 10 34 32 32 29 30 30
NA 3.231 5.538 5.077 5.692 4.231 4.769 4.846
NE 2.223 2.538 2.377 2.446 2.231 2.408 2.246
HE 0.481 0.531 0.490 0.501 0.442 0.502 0.478
HO 0.454 0.481 0.460 0.475 0.483 0.522 0.503
Fis 0.046 0.194 0.147 0.168 -0.078 -0.008 -0.081
PIC 0.435 0.477 0.440 0.476 0.436 0.473 0.460

N: number genotyped; NA: the number of alleles; NE: the effective number of alleles; HE: expected heterozygosity; HO: observed heterozygosity; Fis:fixation index; PIC: polymorphic information content. Collection location codes as in Table 1.

Wilcoxon tests showed evidence for a recent genetic bottleneck at all of the locations except for Liangzi Lake using the SMM model (Table 7). The Gan River also showed a significant bottleneck using the TPM model (p<0.05).

Table 7. Results of tests for genetic bottlenecks in N. douglasiae from seven populations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River using Wilcoxon tests with three different models of evolution and a mode-shift test.

Collection location codes as in Table 1.

Population IAM TPM SMM Mode-shift
LZ 0.8926 0.6848 0.2439 normal L-shaped
DT 0.8394 0.4973 0.0085* normal L-shaped
PY 0.5418 0.1909 0.0040* normal L-shaped
GJ 0.3757 0.0479* 0.0012* normal L-shaped
XN 1.0000 0.2163 0.0215* normal L-shaped
HZ 0.7354 0.3054 0.0085* normal L-shaped
TH 0.4548 0.0803 0.0067* normal L-shaped

*Significant evidence of a recent genetic bottleneck (p<0.05).

Using the data generated from the STRUCTURE analysis, the Evanno et al.[50] ΔK method indicated that K = 2 was the most likely (S1 Fig). Under K = 2, Dongting Lake, Poyang Lake, and the Gan River formed one genetic population and Hongze Lake, Taihu Lake, Liangzi Lake, and Xiannv Lake formed a second genetic population. While, K = 2 was most probable using the Evanno et al.[50] method, K = 3 had a slightly higher log-likelihood score (S1 Fig). With K = 3, Xiannv Lake became a distinct group (Fig 6). The PCoA showed a similar pattern of genetic structure (Fig 7) to the STRUCTURE analysis, with two clusters appearing along axis 1 and Xiannv Lake showing differentiation along axis 2. The PCoA explained 46.9% of the genetic variation across the 13 microsatellite loci in the first two axes.

Fig 6. STRUCTURE bar plots for seven N. douglasiae collection sites in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Fig 6

STRUCTURE runs were completed without a priori populations assigned, admixture and correlated alleles were assumed, The most probable number of populations was K = 2 using the Evanno et al.[33] method, but K = 3 had slightly higher ln likelihood scores. Collection location codes are as in Fig 1.

Fig 7. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on multilocus genotypes of individuals of N. douglasiae from seven collections sites in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Fig 7

Collection location codes and colours are as in Fig 1.

The AMOVA results showed that 36.0% of the total genetic variance was among the seven collection locations, and among sampling location differentiation was significant (p<0.0001, Table 8). Pairwise FST and Jost’s D was congruent with the pattern of genetic structure revealved by analyses done in STRUCTURE and the PCoA showed that genetic differentiation was significant was moderate to high among the seven collection locations with the exception of the comparisons among Dongting Lake, Poyang Lake, and the Gan River and between the Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake (Table 9). Using a Mantel test, genetic differentiation (Fst and Jost’s D) among the collection locations using microsatellites was not significantly correlated with pairwise Fst values calculated for the mtDNA (p>0.05). Estimates of gene flow (Nm) were generally low (i.e., Nm <1) except for among Dongting Lake, Poyang Lake, and the Gan River and between the Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake (Table 10).

Table 8. Analysis of molecular variation (AMOVA) calculated using 13 microsatellite loci for N. douglasiae from seven populations in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River.

Source of variation df SS Variance components Percent variation (%) F-Statistics
Among populations 6 562.2 1.63 36 Fst = 0.359
Among individuals within populations 190 588.7 0.18 4 Fis = 0.063
Within individuals 197 538.0 2.73 60 Fit = 0.399

All F-statistics were statistically significant (p<0.0001).

Table 9. Analysis of genetic differentiation coefficient (Fst) (below diagonal) and Jost Dest (above diagonal) calculated using genotypes from 13 microsatellite loci among seven collection locations of Nodularia douglasiae from the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage.

Bold type indicates statistical significance after Bonferonni correction (α = 0.002381).

LZ DT PY GJ XN HZ TH
LZ 0.652 0.662 0.691 0.317 0.094 0.088
DT 0.416 0.007 0.030 0.746 0.613 0.646
PY 0.438 0.008 0.034 0.760 0.616 0.653
GJ 0.461 0.036 0.044 0.787 0.653 0.687
XN 0.291 0.484 0.523 0.523 0.331 0.348
HZ 0.091 0.401 0.440 0.440 0.290 0.016
TH 0.096 0.435 0.474 0.474 0.320 0.018

Table 10. Estimated gene flow (Nm) (below diagonal) calculated using genotypes form 13 microsatellite loci and among seven collection locations of N. douglasiae from the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage.

LZ DT PY GJ XN HZ TH
LZ
DT 0.351
PY 0.320 30.465
GJ 0.292 6.790 5.713
XN 0.610 0.267 0.246 0.228
HZ 2.508 0.373 0.350 0.318 0.613
TH 2.349 0.325 0.303 0.277 0.532 13.402

Genetic differentiation as represented by pairwise genetic distance values between all seven sample sites were shown to be not correlated with geographic water distance indicating that more geographically distant site combinations did not produce higher levels of genetic differentiation (p = 0.485).

Discussion

The results of this study show clear genetic structure in N. douglasiae across the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage. Two clear genetic groups are revealed using analyses of microsatellite genotypes consisting of 1) Dongting Lake, Poyang Lake, and the Gan River and 2) Liangzi Lake, Xiannv Lake, Hongze Lake, and Taihu Lake. The pattern of genetic structure found using the mtDNA dataset is only partially congruent with the pattern revealed by the microsatellites. The main difference between patterns reveled by the microsatellite and mtDNA datasets was that specimens from Liangzi Lake grouped with specimens from Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake with the microsatellite data, but grouped more closely with Dongting Lake and the Gan River with the mtDNA dataset. The overall resulotion of the pattern of geographic structure among the collection locations was fairly poor and inconsistent using the mtDNA dataset. This poor resolution and inconsistency may be a result of the very high haplotypic diversity among the specimens used (37 haplotypes from 64 individuals) and relatively small sample size of the mtDNA dataset.

The microsatellite dataset is robust and of high quality with few loci out of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and relatively low numbers of null alleles predicted to be present in the dataset. The estimated null allele frequencies were generally below thresholds that would impact the results or interpretations of population-level analyses[5657]. Null alleles in microsatellite datasets are frequently encountered and appear common in bivalves[5859].

Evolutionary history and genetic structure

The geographic structure among the sampling locations using the mtDNA dataset was somewhat ambiguous. This ambiguity was likely a result of the high haplotype diversity (37 haplotypes), but relatively small sample size (n = 64). The COI phylogeny did not resolve N. douglasiae to be monophyletic due to the inclusion of N. nuxpersicae from Vietnam and N. nipponensis from Japan. Klishko et al.[18] found that N. nipponensis was sister to the COI sequences of N. douglasiae that they used in their analysis and thus chose to maintain N. nipponensis as a valid taxon. The phylogeny resolved in this study found that N. nipponensis and N. nuxpersicae were nested within the N. douglasiae COI sequences from the Japan, Russia, South Korea[18], and the Yangtze drainage (from this study); there are two possible explanations for this: (1) that N. douglasiae; N. nipponensis; N. nuxpersicae; the clade of haplotypes H15, H16, and H29; and haplotype H31 are each distinct species or (2) that each of these are divergent lineages of N. douglasiae and that N. nipponensis and N. nuxpersicae can be synonymized into N. douglasiae. The latter explanation is also supported by the pattern of genetic structure revealed by the analyses of the microsatellite dataset (see below). As a result of the phylogenetic analysis of the mtDNA dataset and the microsatellite analyses, only N. douglasiae and N. sinuolata appear to be valid species. Additional studies across the distribution of Nodularia in east Asia appear warranted to determine if Nodularia is a single species or if multiple (possibly cryptic species) exist.

Given that the N. douglasiae COI lineages from the middle and lower Yangtze were distributed across several collection locations, it seems that N. douglasiae is a single species in the study area. One lineage was found in Poyang Lake, the Gan River, and Xiannv Lake, and Hongze Lake (H15, H16, H29, H31; Fig 3), while the second highly diverse lineage was broadly distributed across all collection locations. The haplotype network results (Fig 3) indicated that haplotype diversity was high, but that closely related haplotypes were broadly distributed across most of the sampling locations. An AMOVA of the COI sequence data showed that genetic differentiation was significant among many of the collection locations and that some sampling locations were significantly differentiated from one another. The general pattern of haplotype differentiation among sampling locations indicated the following groups: Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake; Liangzi Lake and Dongting Lake; and Ponyang Lake and Gan River.

Analyses of microsatellite dataset shows that high levels of genetic differentiation exist among the collection locations of N. douglasiae[60], but do not support the existence of more than one species of Nodularia in the study area. The analyses of the microsatellites were much better than the results of the mtDNA sequence data at resolving geographic structure among the collection locations. Despite this pattern, genetic differentiation was low and gene flow was high among Dongting Lake, Poyang Lake, and the Gan River and among the Hongze Lake, Taihu Lake, and Liangzi Lake. The Xiannv Lake collection location was most similar to the Hongze Lake, Taihu Lake, and Liangzi Lake, but was found to be genetically distinct. This pattern of overlap can also be seen in the STRUCTURE plots (Fig 6) and the PCoA (Fig 7). All of the analyses of genetic structure, genetic differentiation, and gene flow were congruent. The pattern of genetic structure revealed by the analyses of the microsatellites is geographic in nature and suggests that the divergent COI lineages freely interbreed as the lineages were found to occur across the groups revealed by the microsatellites (e.g., Xiannv Lake, Poyang Lake, and Gan River).

The results suggest that the connectivity of rivers and lakes in the Yangtze River drainage was very important for dispersal in N. douglasiae. Historically, all seven collection locations were hydrologically connected, however, habitat alterations as a result of dam construction, dredging for canals and sand/gravel mining, and a major increase in urbanization in the last 100 years have had considerable effects of the connectivity among the mainstem of the Yangtze River and its tributaries rivers and lakes[15]. Of the areas sampled in this study, only Poyang Lake (and the Gan River) and Dongting Lake continue to have direct and natural connections to the mainstem of the Yangtze River (i.e., no dams)[12, 61]. The Gan River is the largest river running from north to south in Jiangxi Province, China, flowing into Poyang Lake, and is the seventh largest tributary of the Yangtze River. In 1958, a dam was constructed at the outlet of Xiannv Lake that blocked upstream connectivity from the Gan River (and Poyang Lake)[62]. Between 1942 and 1963, hydrologic connectivity between Liangzi Lake and the Yangtze River was also blocked[6364]. Dredging and canal contruction over the last several hundred years has increased the connections among Hongze Lake, Taihu Lake, the Yangtze River, and the East China Sea[65], but in 1954 a flood control dam was contructed at the outlet of Hongze Lake blocking upstream connectivity from the Yangtze River[66]. Taihu Lake is a geologically recent waterbody, being a large embayment of the East China Sea as recently as 1 million years ago. Gradually it became separated from the sea and is now the third largest freshwater lake in China. The hydrological connectivity among Taihu Lake, the Yangtze River, and the East China Sea has been considerably altered over the last few hundred years as a result of dam construction, canal construction, dredging, and major urbanization[6769].

In theory, an increase of geographic distance should correlate with a gradual reduction of gene flow, resulting in genetic differentiation among populations, i.e., isolation-by-distance[7072]. However, our results showed pairwise genetic distance values between all seven sample sites were not correlated with geographic water distance based on analyses of both microsatellites and mtDNA. Some of the patterns of genetic structure revealed is quite puzzling given that the most geographically proximate collection locations were not always the most genetically similar (e.g., Xiannv Lake and the Gan River). Some of these patterns may have been the result of anthropogenic movement of fish parasitized with glochidia of N. douglasiae for stocking and aquaculture across the region[15, 73]. Given the long history of fish stocking and aquaculture in China[15, 73], it is plausible that some of the observed pattern of genetic structure in N. douglasiae is the result of host fish stocking (moving parasiting larval mussels), but this is at best speculative until more is known about host use by N. douglasiae. It is also plausible that some of the pattern could be attributed to the movement of adult mussels for use as a human food resource, but again this is speculative.

Adult unionids disperse relatively little as adults, with long-distance dispersal being facilitated by hosts during their larval (glochidial) stage[7475]. Given the pattern of genetic structure for N. douglasiae in the system (i.e.; similarities among Poyang Lake, Gan River, and Dongting Lake; and between Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake), it seems that at least some of the host fish species for N. douglasiae are highly vagile and capable of long distance movements through the highly hydrologically interconnected (before the active damming of rivers over the past 50 years) large river and lake system in the Yangtze River drainage, thus the maintainance of gene flow and a high degree of connectivity among habitats may be important. While there are no studies of unionids across the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage, some fish (and potential hosts for N. douglasiae) show similar patterns of genetic structure across the region[7678]. Genetic studies of North American unionids have shown that unionids that use hosts with limited dispersal capabilities like Epioblasma triquetra (Rafinesque, 1820) using Percina caprodes [Rafinesque, 1818; Logperch] show high levels of population divergence and structure even at relatively short geographic distances[79], while unionids using highly vagile host fish capable of moving through large river systems like Quadrula quadrula (Rafinesque, 1820) using Ictalurus punctatus [Rafinesque, 1818; Channel Catfish] show lower levels of population divergence and structure and only show strong divergence and structure in populations separated by relatively high geographic distances[20, 24, 80]. Given that the host fish species of N. douglasiae are currently unknown, inferences about the dispersal abilities is impossible until experiments to determine potential host fish are conducted.

The mismatch distribution analysis and neutrality tests of the mtDNA sequence data suggest that N. douglasiae across the seven collection locations did not have a recent population expansion, and suggested that the current distribution is quite ancient. These analyses also indicate that the population dynamics of N. douglasiae are quite stable. This is not a suprising result given that N. douglasiae is a widely distributed species and often the most abundant unionid species in the region[8, 12, 61, 81]. With the Yangtze River drainage in China being among the most biodiverse regions in the world for unionid mussels[9, 61] and other aquatic organisms[12, 15, 81], this study represents an important first step for understanding the population-level diversity and structure of unionids at a regional scale.

Genetic diversity

Higher levels of genetic diversity among populations of aquatic organisms could improve evolutionary potential for dealing with habitat change, effects of pathogen infection, and other selective forces [8284]. The results analyses of both the mtDNA and microsatellites suggest that there is robust genetic diversity among the populations of N. douglasiae in the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage.

The analyses of the COI seqeuences showed that the haplotype diversity of N. douglasiae among the seven collection locations was high. There were more haplotypes found in N. douglasiae compared with other some rare and imperiled unionids [24, 69], but similar to other widespread species [24, 30].

The genetic diversity estimated from the microsatellite DNA results showed similar levels of genetic diversity to other unionids in the Yangtze River drainage. Mean observed heterozygocity (HO) expected heterozygosity (HE) estimated for N. douglasiae was somewhat lower than that of the widely distributed Sinohyriopsis cumingii (Lea, 1852; heterozygosity: 0.617–0.750)[85] and Solenaia oleivora (HO: 0.501–0.620, HE: 0.598–0.701)[86]. However, levels of heterozygosity calculated for N. douglasiae were somewhat higher than that estimated for Solenaia carinata (HO: 0.472, HE: 0.478)[32], an endemic species found only in Poyang Lake. However, these differences may simply be artifacts of the species-specific microsatellite loci used.

Virtually all N. douglasiae collection locations across the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage showed evidence of a recent bottleneck. It is unclear if these bottlenecks resulted from a founder effect due to colonization by a small founding population with low genetic diversity, or if these were the result of severe demographic reductions followed by subsequent recovery in population size. The moderate levels of genetic diversity as revealed by the polymorphic information criterion (0.25<PIC<0.5), may also be evidence for a recent genetic bottleneck.

Conservation implications

This study represents the first analyses of the genetic structure and diversity for this widespread freshwater mussel and the first for a unionid mussel in the middle and lower Yangtze River drainage. Large-scale patterns of genetic structure occasionally differ among unionid species in the same geographic region[21, 25, 87]. Therefore, elucidating the commonalities in genetic structure and diversity among species will be necessary for making broad conservation inferences. Future research must include studies to determine dispersal capabilities of Yangtze basin unionids during all life stages[74], and studies that develop a clear understanding of the complex patterns displayed by a variety of freshwater mussel species[24]. While still poorly understood, declines in freshwater mussel populations are occurring in China[8,61]. Unionid populations in the Yangtze River region are especially vulnerable and with drastic reductions in abundance and diversity following the human disturbance and habitats fragmentation[8, 12, 61]. Currently, only two lakes (Poyang Lake and Donting Lake) remain connected with the Yangtze River. While status assessments have not been completed, it is estimated that approximately 80% of freshwater mussel species in the Yangtze River region could fall into an endangered or threatened status using IUCN criteria[12, 61]. Conservation efforts should attempt to keep individuals with similar genetic profiles together and avoid mixing of individuals from distinct genetic groups[25, 88].

In this study, N. douglasiae in the Yangtze River region showed robust genetic diversity, and significant and often high genetic differentiation (e.g., some pairwise Fst>0.15) and limited gene flow among the seven collection locations. Moreover, although the historical population dynamics of N. douglasiae appear stable, loss of hydrologic connectivity among rivers and lakes in the Yangtze River drainage may lead to increased isolation of populations and possibly leading depression and population declines. Genetic structure of common species have been shown to be useful surrogates for predicting genetic structure of rare species in North American unionids[2324]. Therefore, studies on the genetic structure and diversity of common and widespread species like N. douglasiae may assist in understanding general patterns for freshwater mussel populations in the Yangtze River drainage. At the same time, we also propose the urgent need for research on the life history of N. douglasiae and other Chinese unionids with an emphasis on characterizing habitat preferences and host-testing experiments to identify potential host fish species.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. STRUCTURE HARVESTER results to determine the most likely K value.

The Evanno et al. method, which compares the ΔK between sequential K values (a) and the comparison of the mean of the estimate of the natural log of the probability of the data amongst K values, with the circle centered over the mean and the bar indicating the standard error (b).

(PDF)

S1 File. Description of the development and characterization of new microsatellite loci for N. douglasiae.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Characterization of the 13 microsatellite loci for N. douglasiae.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Population genetic parameters in seven populations of N. douglasiae.

N: number genotyped; NA: the number of alleles; NE: the effective number of alleles; HE: expected heterozygosity; HO: observed heterozygosity; p: significance of HWE test; Fis:fixation index; PIC: polymorphic information content. Bold type indicates significant deviations from HWE expectations after Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0005495). Site codes as in Table 1.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Estimated null allele frequencies (Brookfield 2 method) for 13 microsatellite loci from N. douglasiae [30].

Bold type indicates significant probability for the presence of null alleles.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. List of all individual Nodularia sp. and outgroups used, collection sites, and GenBank accession codes.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research project came from the Central Michigan University Poyang Lake Research Investment Fund, the Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research Director’s Open Fund, the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31260515; No.81460318), and the Leading Talent Training Plan of the GanPo Outstanding Talents 555 Project (No. 18000041). This article is contribution 92 of the Central Michigan University Institute for Great Lakes Research.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work received support from: the Central Michigan University Poyang Lake Research Investment Fund. Central Michigan University; the Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research Director’s Open Fund. Central Michigan University and Nanchang University; the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31260515, No.81460318). Nanchang University; the Leading Talent Training Plan of the GanPo Outstanding Talents 555 Project (No. 18000041). Nanchang University. This article is contribution 92 of the Central Michigan University Institute for Great Lakes Research.

References

  • 1.Graf DL, Cummings KS. Review of the systematics and global diversity of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Journal of Molluscan Studies. 2007; 73:291–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.He J, Zhuang Z. The freshwater bivalves of China Harxheim, Germany: ConchBooks; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vaughn CC. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 2017; In press. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jones JW, Hallerman EM, Neves RJ. Genetic management guidelines for captive propagation of freshwater mussels (Unionoidea). Journal of Shellfish Research. 2006; 25: 527–535. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Strayer DL. Freshwater Mussel Ecology: A Multifactor Approach to Distribution and Abundance. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barnhart MC, Haag WR, Roston WN. Adaptations to host infection and larval parasitism in Unionoida. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 2008; 27: 370–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Douda K, Lopes-Lima M, Hinzmann M, Machado J, Varandas S, Teixeira A, et al. Biotic homogenization as a threat to native affiliate species: fish introductions dilute freshwater mussel’s resources. Diversity and Distributions. 2013; 19: 933–942. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xiong L, Ouyang S, Wu X. Fauna and standing crop of freshwater mussels in Poyang Lake, China. Chinese. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology. 2012; 30: 124–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zieritz A, Bogan AE, Klishko O, Kondo T, Kovitvadhi U, Kovitvadhi S, et al. Diversity, biogeography and conservation status of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) in East and Southeast Asia. Hydrobiologia. 2017; In press. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu X, Liang Y, Wang H, Xie Z, Ouyang S. Distribution and species diversity of freshwater mollusca of lakes along mid-lower reaches of the Yangtze river. Journal of Lake Sciences. 2000; 12: 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lopes-Lima M, Sousa R, Geist J, Aldridge DC, Araujo R, Bergengren J, et al. Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2017; 92(1): 572–607. doi: 10.1111/brv.12244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shu FY, Wang HJ, Pan BZ, Liu XQ, Wang HZ. Assessment of species status of mollusca in the mid-lower Yangtze lakes. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica. 2009; 33: 1051–1058. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016–3. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Accessed on 22 January 2017.
  • 14.Zhang MH, Xu L, Xie GL, Liu YB, Liu XM, Song SC, et al. Species diversity, distribution and conservation of freshwater mollusk in Poyang Lake basin. Marine Sciences. 2013; 37(8): 114–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fu C, Wu J, Chen J, Wu Q, Lei G. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the Yangtze River basin of China: patterns, threats and conservation. Biodiversity & Conservation. 2003; 12:1649–1685. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fraser DJ. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of Salmonids. Evolutionary Applications. 2008; 1: 535–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00036.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu YY, Zhang WZ, Wang YX, Wang EY. Economic Fauna of China: Freshwater Mollusks. Beijing: Science Press; 1979. pp. 116–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY. Unravelling the systematics of Nodularia (Bivalvia, Unionidae) species from eastern Russia. Systematics and Biodiversity. 2017; 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elderkin CL, Christian AD, Vaughn CC, Metcalfe-Smith JL, Berg DJ. Population genetics of the freshwater mussel, Amblema plicata (Say 1817) (Bivalvia: Unionidae): Evidence of high dispersal and post-glacial colonization. Conservation Genetics. 2007; 8: 355–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mathias PT, Hoffman JR, Wilson CC, Zanatta DT. Signature of postglacial colonization on contemporary genetic structure and diversity of Quadrula quadrula (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Hydrobiologia. 2017; In press. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elderkin CL, Christian AD, Metcalfe-Smith JL, Berg DJ. Population genetics and phylogeography of freshwater mussels in North America, Ellipto dilatata and Actinonaias ligamentina (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Molecular Ecology. 2008; 17: 2149–2163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03745.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haag WR. Williams JD. Biodiversity on the brink: an assessment of conservation strategies for North American freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia. 2014; 735: 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berg DJ, Cantonwine EG, Hoeh WR, Guttman SI. Genetic structure of Quadrula quadrula (Bivalvia: Unionidae): little variation across large distances. Journal of Shellfish Research. 1998; 17: 1365–1373. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Galbraith HS, Zanatta DT, Wilson CC. Comparative analysis of riverscape genetic structure in rare, threatened and common freshwater mussels. Conservation Genetics. 2015; 16: 845–857. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Q, Li L, Wang YG, Werner AD, Xin P, Jiang T, et al. Has the Three-Gorges Dam made the Poyang Lake wetlands wetter and drier? Geophysics Research Letters. 2012; 39(20): L20402.1–L20402.7. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity. 2008; 101(4): 301–320. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Doucet-Beaupré H, Breton S, Chapman EG, Blier PU, Bogan AE et al. Mitochondrial phylogenomics of the Bivalvia (Mollusca): searching for the origin and mitogenomic correlates of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA. BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10(1): 50–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stöger I, Schrödl M. Mitogenomics does not resolve deep molluscan relationships (yet?). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2013; 69 (2): 376–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Collier KJ, Probert PK, Jeffries M. Conservation of aquatic invertebrates: concerns, challenges and conundrums. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2016; 26: 817–837. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zanatta DT, Murphy RW. The phylogeographical and management implications of genetic population structure in the imperiled snuffbox mussel, Epioblasma triquetra (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2008; 93: 371–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Geist J, Geismar J, Kuehn R. Isolation and characterization of the first microsatellite markers for the endangered swan mussel Anodonta cygnea L. (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Conservation Genetics. 2010; 11: 1103–1106. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sun TT, Liu X, Zhou C, Ding H, Yang W, Zanatta DT, et al. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity and genetic structure of the Chinese freshwater mussel Solenaia carinata (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2017; In press. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.DeWoody JA, Schupp J, Kenefic L, Busch J, Murfitt L, Keim P. Universal method for producing ROX-labeled size standards suitable for automated genotyping. Biotechniques. 2004; 37:348–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewinak F. The Clustal2X windows interface: flexible strategies ed for multiple sequences alignment aided by quality analysis, tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997; 25 (24): 4876–4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 2009; 25(11):1451 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling AS, et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012; 61: 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nylander JAA. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clement M, Snell Q, Walke P, Posada D, Crandall, K. TCS: estimating gene genealogies. Proceedings of the 16th International Parallel Distributions Process Symposium. 2002; 2:184.
  • 39.Leigh JW, Bryant D. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015; 6(9):1110–1116. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2010; 10(3): 564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST. Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genetics. 2005; 6: 13 v.3.23 http://ibdws.sdsu.edu/ doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus OG. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2005; 22: 1185–1192. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007; 7: 214 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. Tracer v1.5. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.2007.
  • 45.Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle TJ, Ye Z, Xian JM. POPGENE32, Microsoft Windows-based free-ware for population genetic analysis, version 1.32 Canada: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Alberta, Edmonton; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology. 2007; 16: 1099–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM., Shipley P. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2004; 4: 535–538. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity. 1999; 90: 502–503. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155: 945–949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 2005; 14: 2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Earl D, Von Holdt B. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 2012; 4: 359–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28: 2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist. 1972; 106: 283–292. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992; 131: 479–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jost L. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology. 2008; 17: 4015–4026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dakin EE, Avise JC. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity. 2004; 93:504–509. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Carlsson J. Effects of microsatellite null alleles on assignment testing. Journal of Heredity. 2008; 99:616–623. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esn048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Astanei IE, Gosling JW, Powell E. Genetic variability and phylogeography of the invasive zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas). Molecular Ecology. 2005; 14: 1655–1666. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02530.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li G, Hubert S, Bucklin K, Ribes V, Hedgecock D. Characterization of 79 microsatellite DNA markers in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2003; 3: 228–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wright S. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 1965; 19: 395–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wu XP. Studies on Freshwater Mollusca in Mid reaches of Changjiang River. Ph. D. Thesis. Wuhan: Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 1998.
  • 62.Li WH, Zhang M, Meng JS, Ao XF, Hu XY, Ouyang S, et al. Community structure of macrozoobenthos in Xiannv Lake basin and assessment of its water. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin. 2016; 25: 1218–1227. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang QH, Dong XH, Yang XD. Environmental evolution of Lake Liangzi and its driving factors over the past 100 years, Hubei Province. Journal of Lake Sciences. 2016; 28(3):545–553. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li ZH, Sun DZ. Study on ecological environmental protection in Liangzi Lake Beijing: Science Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang Q, Chen JY. Formation and evolution of Hongze Lake and the Huaihe River mouth along the lake. Journal of Lake Sciences. 1999; 11(3): 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Han SQ. Research on the processes and backgrounds of the changes of the Honze Lake during Historical period. Journal of Chinese Historical Geography. 1998; 2: 61–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu JL. The origin and evolution of Taihu Lake: a 11000 year journal. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. 1996; 35(2): 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hong XQ. Origin and evolution of the Thaihu Lake. Marine geology and quaternary geology. 1991; 11(4): 87–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jing CY. Formation and evolution of Taihu Lake. Scientia geographica sinica. 1989; 9(4): 378–385. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Barton NH, Kelleher J, Etheridge AM. A new model for extinction and recolonization in two dimensions: quantifying phylogeography. Evolution. 2010; 64: 2701–2715. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01019.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hurtrez-Boussès S, Hurtrez JE, Turpin H, Durand C, Durand P, De Meeus T, et al. Hydrographic network structure and population genetic differentiation in a vector of fasciolosis, Galba truncatula. Infection Genetics and Evolution. 2010; 10: 178–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Husemann M, Ray JW, King RS, Hooser EA, Danley PD. Comparative biogeography reveals differences in population genetic structure of five species of stream fishes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2012; 107: 867–885. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhu B, Zheng HT, Que YF, Chang JB. Fish stocking program in the Yangtze River. Chinese Fisheries Economics. 2009; 27:74–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ferguson CD, Blum MJ, Raymer ML, Eackles MS, Krane DE. Population structure, multiple paternity, and long-distance transport of spermatozoa in the freshwater mussel Lampsilis cardium (Bivalvia:Unionidae). Freshwater Science. 2013; 32:267–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Haag WR. North American Freshwater Mussels: Natural History, Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liao X, Yu X, Tong J. Genetic diversity of common carp from two largest Chinese lakes and the Yangtze River revealed by microsatellite markers. Hydrobiologia. 2006; 568:445–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wang C, Yu X, Tong J. Microsatellite diversity and population genetic structure of redfin culter (Culter erythropterus) in fragmented lakes of the Yangtze River. Hydrobiologia. 2007; 586:321–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Abbas K, Zhou X, Li Y, Gao Z, Wang W. Microsatellite diversity and population genetic structure of yellowcheek, Elopichthys bambusa (Cyprinidae) in the Yangtze River. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2010; 38:806–812 [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zanatta DT, Wilson CC. Testing congruency of geographic and genetic population structure for a freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionoida) and its host fish. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2011; 102: 669–685. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Paterson WL, Griffith TA, Burlakova LE, Krebs RW, Zanatta DT. An evaluation of the genetic structure of mapleleaf mussels (Quadrula quadrula) in the Lake Erie watershed. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2015; 41: 1123–1130. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang X, Lin ZT. Morphology of freshwater mussel and common species in China. Bulletin of Biology. 1959; (5):14–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Freeland JL, Petersen SD, Kirk H. Molecular Ecology, (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liu XH, Yao YG. Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers in the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis). Zoological Research. 2013; 34: E62–E68. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.E02E62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wu SZ, Guan YY, Huang XD, He MX. Development of 25 novel microsatellite loci and genetic variation analysis in breeding populations of the pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 2013; 44: 600–609. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Luo YM. Genetic diversity of four Hyriopsis cumingii (Bivalvia: Unionidae) populations by SSR analysis. Hubei: Huazhong Agricultural University; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Xu Y. Isolation of microsatellite markers and population genetic diversity analysis in Solenaia oleivora Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Scott MW, Begley MT, Krebs RA, Zanatta DT. Mitochondrial DNA variation in the Eastern Pondmussel, Ligumia nasuta (Bivalvia: Unionoida), in the Great Lakes region. Walkerana. 2014; 17: 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hoftyzer E, Ackerman JD, Morris TJ, Mackie GL. Genetic and environmental implications of reintroducing laboratory-raised unionid mussels into the wild. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2008; 65: 1217–1229. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. STRUCTURE HARVESTER results to determine the most likely K value.

The Evanno et al. method, which compares the ΔK between sequential K values (a) and the comparison of the mean of the estimate of the natural log of the probability of the data amongst K values, with the circle centered over the mean and the bar indicating the standard error (b).

(PDF)

S1 File. Description of the development and characterization of new microsatellite loci for N. douglasiae.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Characterization of the 13 microsatellite loci for N. douglasiae.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Population genetic parameters in seven populations of N. douglasiae.

N: number genotyped; NA: the number of alleles; NE: the effective number of alleles; HE: expected heterozygosity; HO: observed heterozygosity; p: significance of HWE test; Fis:fixation index; PIC: polymorphic information content. Bold type indicates significant deviations from HWE expectations after Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0005495). Site codes as in Table 1.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Estimated null allele frequencies (Brookfield 2 method) for 13 microsatellite loci from N. douglasiae [30].

Bold type indicates significant probability for the presence of null alleles.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. List of all individual Nodularia sp. and outgroups used, collection sites, and GenBank accession codes.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES