Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 20;7:17886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18183-3

Table 1.

Rating of stimulation. Participants were divided into three groups: Verum vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at the cymba concha of the left ear, sham stimulation (Sham) at the helix and a control group (Control), in which the stimulator was applied to the cymba concha but never switched on. All participants rated their conviction of the stimulation efficacy (0 = not convinced, 10 = very convinced), the operability of the stimulation (0 = stimulation did not work, 10 = stimulation worked well), and the valence of the stimulation (0 = unpleasant, 10 = pleasant). #Difference of VNS and Sham group. +Difference of VNS and Control group. ~Difference of Sham and Control group.

VNS Sham Control statistics
Conviction (SD) 5.68 (0.36) 6.44 (0.43) 5.24 (0.47) p = 0.130
Operability (SD) 7.20 (0.44) 8.36 (0.40) 6.68 (0.53) p = 0.035*,~
Valence (SD) 5.20 (0.40) 6.84 (0.43) 6.84 (0.56) p = 0.020*,#,+

*p < 0.05.