Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Glob Health. 2017 Nov 20;83(5-6):726–734. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.023

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios, 95% confident intervals and P value of the relationship of mode of administration of screens to identify childhood physical abuse and proportion of childhood abuse: Complete case and Multiple imputation model

Exposure Complete case
model
(N=512)		 P value Multiple imputation
model
(N=532 × 10)		 P Value
Mode of Administration
Paper & Pencil 1.0 1.0
ACASI 1.02 (0.63, 1.67) 0.9297 0.99 (0.61– 1.61) 0.9781
Structured face to face 1.53 (0.92, 2.58) 0.1029 1.58 (0.95–2.65) 0.0779
Unstructured face to face 4.30 (2.49, 7.43) <0.0001 4.16 (2.45–7.08) <0.0001

Final model was adjusted by age, gender, race/ethnicity, depression, living arrangement and last grade completed in both complete case and imputation model.