Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan;221(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.014

Table 3.

Percentage of point-of-consumption water samples in each contamination category, by water source, sanitation type and water storage status.

Variable Category Ghana
Bangladesh
Nepal
0 CFU 1–31 CFU >31 CFU 0 CFU 1–31 CFU >31 CFU 0 CFU 1–31 CFU >31 CFU
Water source Piped to premises 34.5% 45.1% 20.5% 22.8% 16.8% 60.3% 27.2% 39.6% 33.3%
Standpipe, tanker or neighbours tap 13.8% 29.1% 57.1% 44.5% 25.2% 30.3% 11.4% 44.5% 44.1%
Tubewell or
borehole*
10.5% 29.2% 60.3% 39.2% 38.6% 22.2% 18.5% 43.9% 37.6%
Protected well or spring* 11.8% 27.5% 60.7% 9.6% 44.5% 45.9%
Unprotected well or spring 12.2% 25.1% 62.6% 23.7% 28.3% 48.0% 3.8% 39.8% 56.4%
Surface water 5.1% 8.4% 86.6% 4.6% 52.5% 42.9% 9.1% 25.7% 65.2%
Sachet or bottled water 68.8% 27.7% 3.5% 34.0% 35.5% 30.5%
Rainwater 7.1% 42.3% 50.6%
Sanitation Improved 31.5% 29.1% 39.4% 38.6% 36.3% 25.2% 19.7% 41.8% 38.5%
Unimproved 13.6% 26.9% 59.5% 33.3% 38.3% 28.4% 12.6% 44.9% 42.6%
Water storage Not stored 47.1% 28.6% 24.2% 49.8% 31.8% 18.5% 17.6% 44.6% 37.9%
Stored in covered vessel or filter 17.4% 29.7% 52.9% 32.9% 35.9% 31.3% 27.6% 40.5% 31.9%
Stored in uncovered vessel 6.4% 20.1% 73.5% 35.6% 41.2% 23.2% 5.1% 42.1% 52.7%

For Bangladesh, the water sources “tubewell or borehole” and “protected well or spring” were merged due to a small number of households reporting the latter water source.