Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0190141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190141

Table 2. Spinal flexibility and in-orthosis correction.

Group Pre-orthosis Standing
(X-ray*)
Spinal Flexibility (US*) In-orthosis Correction (X-ray*)
Supine Prone Sitting bending Prone
bending
Mild thoracic curves (n = 10) 22° ± 2° 41% ± 22% a,b 43% ± 18% a,b 159% ± 46% 135% ± 20% 38% ± 21%
Moderate thoracic curves (n = 24) 32° ± 5° 36% ± 19% a 37% ± 20% a 126% ± 39% 116% ± 35% 33% ± 19%
Mild thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (n = 13) 20° ± 4° 46% ± 23% a 45% ± 14% a,b 174% ± 66% 149% ± 34% 48% ± 24%
Moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (n = 20) 31° ± 5° 42% ± 16% a 46% ± 17% a,b 137% ± 64% 121% ± 35% 48% ± 24%
Overall curves(n = 67) 28° ± 7° 40% ± 19% a 42% ± 18% a,b 143% ± 56% 127% ± 34% 41% ± 23%

* X-ray: X-ray assessment, US: ultrasound assessment.

a no significant difference with the corresponding in-orthosis correction (p>0.05).

b good correlation with the corresponding in-orthosis correction (r>0.75).