Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 20;8(62):106009–106016. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22520

Table 3. Evaluation of low-risk criteria according to KSGO, SOGC, INCa, and fertility-sparing therapy candidates.

Low risk group FSS candidates
KSGO (n=178) SOGC (n=204) INCa (n=249) NCCN (n=48) KGOG 2020 (n=99)
Pathologic stage
 IA 166 (93.3%) 176 (86.3%) 225 (90.4%) 47 (97.9%) 94 (95.0%)
 IB 8 (4.5%) 21 (10.3%) 12 (4.8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 II 1 (0.6%) 1 (0.5%) 6 (2.4%) 0 (0%) 3 (3.0%)
 IIIA 0 (0%) 2 (1.0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 IIIB 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 IIIC 3 (1.7%) 4 (2.0%) 6 (2.4%) 1 (2.1%) 2 (2.0%)
 IV 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
≥Stage II 4 (2.3%) 7 (3.4%) 12 (4.8%) 1 (2.1%) 5 (5.1%)
Lymph node metastasis 3 (1.7%) 4 (2.0%) 6 (2.4%) 1 (2.1%) 2 (2.0%)
AUC* (95% CI) 0.65 (0.62-0.69) 0.67 (0.63-0.71) 0.70 (0.65-0.75) 0.54 (0.52-0.56) 0.58 (0.55-0.61)

*For the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis.

FSS, fertility-sparing surgery; KSGO, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; SOGC, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; INCa, French National Cancer Institute (INCa); NCCN, National Cancer Comprehensive Network; KGOG, Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.