Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 30;8(63):106935–106947. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22149

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis of associations with overall survival of CRC patients (Cox proportional hazards regression model).

Cohort 1: protein analysisa Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variables HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Age (≥67 vs. <67 years) 1.0221 0.5392–1.9513 0.9464 - - -
Sex (female vs. male) 1.1388 0.5899–2.1703 0.6940 - - -
Tumor size (≥41 vs. <41 mm) 2.1199 0.2450–0.8953 0.0217b 1.2909 0.5778–2.9105 0.5320
T classification (T3,4 vs. Tis,1,2) 4.2072 1.7953–12.3012 0.0004 3.5129 1.2079–12.7563 0.0198
Lymph node metastasis 3.0386 1.5791–6.1326 0.0008 1.8401 0.9048–3.8839 0.0927
Distant metastasis 5.0544 2.3611–10.1594 0.0001 5.5591 2.2504–13.6501 0.0003
Pathology (poor or mucinous vs. mod/well differentiated) 4.7735 1.9072–10.4208 0.0018 2.962 1.1080–7.0463 0.0319
Lymphatic invasion (present vs. absent) 1.7639 0.7896–4.6936 0.1765 - - -
Venous invasion (present vs. absent) 2.8751 1.5170–5.5277 0.0013 1.2484 0.6071–2.6074 0.5470
Ezrin expression (≥5 vs. <5)c 2.7459 1.2651–5.4878 0.0124 2.3125 1.0214–4.8337 0.0447
Cohort 2: mRNA analysisd Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variables HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Age (≥67 vs. <67 years) 2.7073 1.5141–5.0460 0.0007 2.0244 0.9946–4.2722 0.0518
Sex (female vs. male) 1.0514 0.5306–1.6711 0.8629 - - -
Tumor size (≥45 vs. <45 mm) 2.3455 1.3196–4.3201 0.0035 1.3162 0.6415–2.6436 0.4465
T classification (T3,4 vs. Tis,1,2) 6.3684 0.0963–10.3835 <0.0001 4.5510 2.1800–5.1080 0.0001
Lymph node metastasis 3.4421 1.9323–6.3528 <0.0001 1.4954 0.7406–3.0657 0.2611
Distant metastasis 9.6295 5.4338–17.0310 <0.0001 3.8089 1.7901–7.8652 0.0008
Pathology (poor or mucinous vs. mod/well differentiated) 1.9778 0.8594–3.9946 0.1027 - - -
Lymphatic invasion (present vs. absent) 7.0374 1.5422–124.5554 0.0062 1.7671 0.3181–33.2918 0.5694
Venous invasion (present vs. absent) 3.1039 1.3538–8.9684 0.0054 1.2428 0.1962–4.3652 0.7784
Ezrin expression (≥0.58 vs. <0.58)c 2.2183 1.1032–4.3253 0.0262 1.6608 0.7984–3.3463 0.1702

aFor Cohort 1 protein analysis, the average patient age and tumor size was 66.7 years and 40.8 mm, respectively.

bStatistically significant associations are shown in bold (P < 0.05).

cThe cut-off values for high/low Ezrin expression were 5.0 for protein and 0.58 for mRNA.

dFor Cohort 2 mRNA analysis, the average patient age and tumor size was 67.3 years and 44.6 mm, respectively.