Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;8(63):107295–107302. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22364

Table 2. Subgroup and sensitive analyses for HBV infection on the risk of NAFLD.

Subgroup No. of studies RR (95%CI) I2 value (%) P value
All studies 5 0.71 (0.53, 0.90) 75.2 0.006
Study quality
 ≥ 7 4 0.70 (0.55, 0.86) 71.3 0.015
 < 7 1 3.96 (2.1, 7.48)
Study design
 Cohort 1 0.83 (0.73, 0.94)
 Case control 1 3.96 (2.10, 7.48)
 Cross sectional 3 0.63 (0.47, 0.79) 21.9 0.278
Adjustment for confounders
Alcohol intake
 Yes 2 0.66 (0.26, 0.92) 80.4 0.024
 No 3 1.02 (0.23, 1.81) 69.0 0.040
Cholesterol level
 Yes 3 0.63 (0.47, 0.79) 71.3 0.015
 No 2 0.92 (0.81, 1.61) 80.7 0.203
Diabetes
 Yes 3 0.63 (0.47, 0.79) 21.9 0.278
 No 2 0.92 (0.81, 1.61) 80.7 0.203
Diagnosis of fatty liver
 Ultrasound 4 0.77 (0.57, 0.97) 77.6 0.004
 H-MRS 1 0.42 (0.20, 0.88)
Sensitive analyses
 High quality studies 4 0.70 (0.55, 0.86) 71.3 0.015
 Excluding the study using MRS 4 0.77 (0.57, 0.97) 77.6 0.004
Fixed-effects vs random-effects model method
 Fixed-effects model 5 0.70 (0.65, 0.76) 75.2 0.003
 Random-effects model 5 0.71 (0.53, 0.90) 75.2 0.003

HBV, hepatitis B virus. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.