Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;62(1):e01970-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01970-17

TABLE 2.

MIC range and resistance rates for ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam according to results for expression of oprD, efflux pumps, and chromosomal ampC among non-carbapenemase-producing CRPA clinical isolates

Resistance mechanism No. of isolates MIC range (median) (mg/liter)
% resistance
Ceftolozane-tazobactam Ceftazidime-avibactam Ceftolozane-tazobactam Ceftazidime-avibactam
Decreased oprD expression
    Positive (≤30% compared with PAO1)a 39 1–32 (2) 2–32 (8) 5.1 25.6
    Negative (>30% compared with PAO1) 3 2–4 (2) 8–16 (16) 0 66.7
Overexpressed mexB
    Positive (≥3-fold compared with PAO1)a 23 1–32 (2) 2–32 (8) 4.3 34.8
    Negative (<2-fold compared with PAO1) 12 1–16 (2) 2–16 (4) 8.3 25.0
Overexpressed mexD
    Positive (≥10-fold compared with PAO1) 6 1–4 (2) 2–8 (4) 0 0
    Negative (<5-fold compared with PAO1) 35 1–32 (2) 2–32 (8) 5.7 34.3
Overexpressed mexF
    Positive (≥10-fold compared with PAO1) 5 1–4 (2) 2–16 (8) 0 40
    Negative (<5-fold compared with PAO1) 29 1–32 (2) 2–32 (8) 6.9 24.1
Overexpressed ampC
    Positive (≥10-fold compared with PAO1) 17 1–32 (4) 2–16 (8) 5.9 23.5
    Negative (<5-fold compared with PAO1) 25 1–16 (2) 2–32 (4) 4.0 32.0
a

P < 0.05 in comparison of percent resistance to ceftolozane-tazobactam with that to ceftazidime-avibactam.