Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 4;54(11):732–741. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104588

Table 3.

Rare missense variant associations with BC by domain

Domain (AA Start-AA End) Case carriers Control carriers OR (95% CI) p Value Pdiff
ATM All rare missense 489 175 1.18 (0.99 to 1.40) 0.073
In any domain 127 37 1.44 (1.00 to 2.08) 0.059 0.24
Not in any domain 362 138 1.10 (0.90 to 1.35) 0.36
TAN (7-165) 17 10 0.71 (0.33 to 1.56) 0.52
FAT (2097–2488) 67 18 1.56 (0.93 to 2.63) 0.12
PI3K (2714–2961) 43 9 2.01 (0.98 to 4.12) 0.074
FAT + PI3K domains 110 27 1.71 (1.12 to 2.61) 0.015
CHEK2 All rare missense 162 50 1.36 (0.99 to 1.87) 0.066
In any domain 115 32 1.51 (1.02 to 2.24) 0.047 0.45
Not in any domain 47 18 1.10 (0.64 to 1.89) 0.85
FHA (113-191) 47 14 1.41 (0.78 to 2.56) 0.32
Pkinase (220-486) 68 18 1.59 (0.94 to 2.67) 0.10
PALB2 All rare missense 174 57 1.28 (0.95 to 1.73) 0.12
In any domain 132 40 1.39 (0.97 to 1.98) 0.083 0.50
Not in any domain 42 17 1.04 (0.59 to 1.82) 1.00
BRCA1 binding (1-319) 71 17 1.76 (1.03 to 2.98) 0.047
ChAM (395-466) 11 8 0.58 (0.23 to 1.43) 0.34
RAD51/BRCA2 binding (853–1186) 50 15 1.40 (0.79 to 2.49) 0.31
Both binding domains 121 32 1.59 (1.08 to 2.35) 0.024
Combined All rare missense 825 282 1.24 (1.08 to 1.43) 0.0025
In any domain 374 109 1.45 (1.17 to 1.80) 7.3x10-4 0.060
Not in any domain 451 173 1.09 (0.92 to 1.31) 0.33

Domain boundaries were determined from Pfam (ATM and CHEK2) or UniProt (PALB2).

BC, breast cancer.