Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;17:880. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3901-5

Table 3.

Overall survival and progression-free survival from the start of second-line therapy for individual drugs and from the start of first-line therapy for the most common treatment sequences

Second-line targeted drug n Median OS (95% CI) Median PFS (95% CI) Overall response rate, n (%) a Disease control rate n (%)a
Everolimus 520 17.0 months (14.5–19.5) 6.3 months (5.6–6.9) 30 (6.7) 201 (45.1)
Sorafenib 240 17.1 months (14.5–19.8) 5.8 months (4.7–6.8) 23 (9.9) 113 (48.7)
Sunitinib 228 15.4 months (11.0–19.7) 5.7 months (4.4–7.0) 25 (12.1) 73 (35.3)
Sunitinib → everolimus 390 37.2 months (31.5–42.9) 22.7 months (19.5–26.0)b 32 (8.2) 176 (45.1)
Sunitinib → sorafenib 232 32.7 months (27.1–38.2) 19.0 months (15.8–22.3 b 24 (10.3) 119 (51.3)
Sorafenib → sunitinib 139 31.8 months (25.8–37.7) 18.5 months (16.2–20.7)b 19 (13.7) 54 (38.8)
Sorafenib → everolimus 93 32.2 months (26.0–38.3) 21.4 months (18.0–24.9)b 3 (3.2) 52 (55.9)

95%CI 95% confidence intervals, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival

aData for best response assessment were available for 446, 232, and 207 patients treated with everolimus, sorafenib, and sunitinib, respectively

bPFS for sequences was the time from first-line treatment initiation to the date of documented progression on the second-line therapy