Table 3.
Model selection table for models with the highest support (Δi≦2) investigating calling occurrences, the number of calls per interaction bout, the three PCs, call duration, and the responses to playbacks of defensive calls manipulated in fo and call duration
| Response | Model No. | Fixed factors | AICc | Δi | Relative likelihood | Akaike weight |
| Calling propensity | 1 | Level of aggression | 960.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Level of aggression + rank difference | 961.2 | 0.9 | 0.65 | 0.33 | |
| Number of calls/bout | 1 | Level of aggression | 528.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.49 |
| 2 | Level of aggression + rank difference | 530.1 | 2.0 | 0.36 | 0.18 | |
| fo component | 1 | Level of aggression * rank difference | 823.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.78 |
| Amplitude component | 1 | Level of aggression | 635.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.58 |
| Jitter and tonality component | 1 | Rank difference | 987.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.72 |
| Call duration | 1 | Level of aggression * rank difference | −1310.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.87 |
| QAICc | Δi | Relative likelihood | QAkaike weight | |||
| Pitch manipulation | 1 | Manipulation type | 37.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.61 |
| Duration manipulation | 1 | Null | 60.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.72 |
Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) values, the difference between the lowest AICc value and all other AICc values (Δi), the relative likelihood, and resulting Akaike weights are presented (for the models on the playback experiment, quasi (Q) values are shown). “*” indicate main factors and their two-way interaction