Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 12;8:127–137. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S116477

Table 3.

Facilitators and barriers to establishing/implementing QS teams, N (%)

West
(N=91)
East
(N=58)
Ontario
(N=100)
P*
Facilitators
Management/supervisor leadership 66 (72.5) 47 (81.0) 87 (87.0) 0.042
Board/senior leadership support 70 (76.9) 30 (51.7) 79 (79.0) 0.001
Multidisciplinary team membership 68 (74.7) 33 (56.9) 64 (64.0) 0.067
Clinician buy in 53 (58.2) 22 (37.9) 52 (52.0) 0.052
Data availability and IT 40 (44.0) 17 (29.3) 52 (52.0) 0.022
Time availability to meet with the team 36 (39.6) 27 (46.6) 30 (30.0) 0.100
Financial resources to support work 31 (34.1) 12 (20.7) 22 (22.0) 0.093
Barriers
Human resources to support work 50 (54.9) 34 (58.6) 40 (40.0) 0.037
Clinician buy in 39 (42.9) 14 (24.1) 29 (29.0) 0.034
Culture of organization 35 (38.5) 14 (24.1) 22 (22.0) 0.030
Empowerment of clinicians/staff to implement initiatives 31 (34.1) 13 (22.4) 20 (20.0) 0.068
Clear and defined objectives for initiative 18 (19.8) 17 (29.3) 14 (14.0) 0.066
Communication between team members 11 (12.1) 13 (22.4) 10 (10.0) 0.078
Board/senior leadership support 12 (13.2) 12 (20.7) 8 (8.0) 0.071

Notes:

*

p-Value comparing differences in proportions between regions. A significance level of 0.01 was used to adjust for post hoc multiple comparisons.

Abbreviations: QS, quality and safety; IT, information technology.