Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 22;10(5):420–431. doi: 10.1159/000477406

Table 3.

Associations between ZNA and body fatness measures (skinfold thickness and waist circumference)a

ZNA variables N Skinfold thickness

β-coefficient (95% CI) p value

Gross motor tasks
Dynamic balance 286 −2.18 (−4.27, −0.09) 0.041
 Walking on a straight line* 333 −0.94 (−2.72, 0.83) 0.30
 Jumping sideward* 321 −1.92 (−3.63, −0.22) 0.027
 Hopping on one leg* 297 −1.35 (−3.12, 0.41) 0.13
 Running* 333 0.37 (−1.10, 1.83) 0.63
 Static Balance 326 −0.69 (−2.68, 1.30) 0.50
Fine motor tasks
 Pegboard 345 0.78 (−1.16, 2.71) 0.43
 Pure motor 326 1.48 (−0.64, 3.61) 0.17

Waist circumference

β-coefficient (95% CI) p value

Gross motor tasks
 Dynamic balance 296 −1.75 (−4.90, 1.41) 0.28
 Walking on a straight line* 345 −1.09 (−3.80, 1.61) 0.43
 Jumping sideward* 330 −3.34 (−5.98, −0.69) 0.014
 Hopping on one leg* 309 −0.82 (−3.48, 1.83) 0.54
 Running* 346 1.21 (−1.01, 3.43) 0.28
 Static balance 336 −0.71 (−3.75, 2.33) 0.65
Fine motor tasks
 Pegboard 361 1.06 (−1.88, 3.99) 0.48
 Pure motor 338 2.36 (−0.91, 5.64) 0.16

CI = Confidence interval.

a

Coefficients were obtained from multilevel models and are adjusted for children's age and sex, parental ISEI, sociocultural region of Switzerland, and total physical activity. In the multilevel models, outcomes variables (i.e., ZNA components) were multiplied by 100 for better visual reading. All ZNA variables are reported as component.

*

Based on SDS data (see statistical analysis).