Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 Jan;38(1):38–42. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000252

Table 2.

Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Training (n = 19)a.b

Baseline Exit Change P Value
Male patients, n 11 --- --- ---
Age, y 67 ± 7
METspeak 4.6 ± 1.6 6.2 ± 2.4 1.6 ± 1.2 <.0001
V̇O2peak, mL/kg/minc 14.4 ± 3.5 16.4 ± 4.6 2.0 ± 2.8 .02
Handgrip strength, kg 29 ± 9 31 ± 9 2 ± 2 .02
MOS SF-36 Physical Function scored 57 ± 18 69 ± 22 13 ± 20 .02
PHQ-9 5 ± 5 3 ± 4 −2 ± 4 .05

Abbreviations: CR, cardiac rehabilitation; METs, metabolic equivalent of task; MOS SF-36 Physical Function, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Physical Function component; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; SD, standard deviation; V̇O2peak, peak oxygen uptake.

a

Data are presented as mean ± SD except as otherwise noted.

b

All patients with baseline and exit measures completed 36 cardiac rehabilitation sessions.

c

n = 14 patients who had cardiopulmonary exercise test before and after CR.

d

Maximum possible score = 100.